HYDERABAD: A division bench of the Sindh High Court, Hyderabad circuit, here on Friday issued notices to the senior member Board of Revenue, Sindh chief secretary, Hyderabad and Mirpurkhas commissioners, Shaheed Benazirabad and Sanghar deputy commissioners and others for June 18 on a constitutional petition filed by five lawmakers against creation of Shaheed Benazirabad division.

The bench comprised Justice Nisar Mohammad Shaikh and Justice Mohammad Iqbal Kalhoro.

Five Pakistan Muslim League-Functional (PML-F) members of the Sindh Assembly Jam Madad Ali, Waryam Faqir Waryamani, Saeed Khan Nizamani, Haji Khuda Bukhsh Rajar and Nand Kumar, stated in the petition that Sindh government was authorised under sections 5 and 6 of the Land Revenue Act, 1967, to notify new districts and divisions and define their boundaries but these powers must be exercised fairly, reasonably and in good faith.

They alleged that the June 6, 2014 notification creating new division of Shaheed Benazirabad, comprising districts of Shaheed Benazirabad, Sanghar and Naushahro Feroze, with its headquarter at Nawabshah was issued with mala fide intention. Its creation has nothing to do with administrative convenience or ease of revenue collections, they claimed.

“It is done to enhance standing of Nawabshah and confer upon it status of divisional headquarter which will provide a direct financial benefit to politically influential landowners of Nawabshah,” the petitioners alleged, adding that “this is done clandestinely without a public discussion and without consulting elected representatives of the affected areas.”

They submitted that Sanghar was an under-developed area and was prone to floods and drought. “Its Khipro desert is inaccessible,” they said, and cited observations of government and relief organisation that provision of food, water and medical aid to far flung areas of Sanghar from Mirpurkhas was difficult.

The petitioners argued that in the midst of relief work and calamity, the respondents had taken an administrative decision which would impede relief operation.

They said that Sanghar’s inclusion in the new division was unreasonable and against public interest. It would be difficult to administer and supervise its remote areas from Nawabshah, they added.

They claimed that the respondents were creating Shaheed Benazirabad division to accommodate their home constituency and establish a headquarter there at the expense of other districts.

They prayed to the court to declare the June 6, 2014 notification unlawful and mala fide and suspend its operation.

They also urged the court to restrain the respondents from removing Sanghar district from Mirpurkhas division.

Published in Dawn, June 14th, 2014

Opinion

Editorial

Mixed signals
Updated 28 Dec, 2024

Mixed signals

If Imran wants talks to yield results, he should authorise PTI’s committee to fully engage with the other side without setting deadlines.
Opaque trials
Updated 28 Dec, 2024

Opaque trials

Secretive trials, shielded from scrutiny, fail to provide the answers that citizens deserve.
A friendly neighbour
28 Dec, 2024

A friendly neighbour

FORMER Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh who passed away on Thursday at 92 was a renowned economist who pulled ...
Desperate measures
Updated 27 Dec, 2024

Desperate measures

Sadly in Pakistan, street protests and sit-ins have become the only resort to catch the attention of a callous power elite.
Economic outlook
27 Dec, 2024

Economic outlook

THE post-pandemic years, marked by extreme volatility in the global oil and commodity markets as well as slowing...
Cricket and visas
27 Dec, 2024

Cricket and visas

PAKISTAN has asserted that delay in the announcement of the schedule of next year’s Champions Trophy will not...