ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Friday rejected post-arrest bail petitions of two accused in Employees Old-Age Benefit Institution (EOBI) scam.

The court, however, accepted the bail applications of three other accused in the case, Najamus Saqib and Abid Mehmood, members of EOBI investment board as well as Hazoor Bukhsh Naeem, a local land owner of Fatehjang.

According to the investigations into Rs40 billion misappropriations, which came to light in 2012, the then EOBI management made investments in DHA scheme, purchased Crown Plaza in Islamabad at double than the market price and in an alleged illegal manner.

As per reports submitted by the FIA in the court, the EOBI management purchased two 4,300cc Prados for personal use of EOBI officers, purchased two controversial plots in Sukkur, bought seven plots from the CDA.

The FIA said the EOBI purchased 40 kanals and 16 marlas in Lahore, four floors of Plaza Hotel in Lahore and made investment in a seven-star hotel in front of the Lahore airport.

Deciding bail petitions of the accused IHC Justice Noorul Haq N. Qureshi observed that Rana Abdul Qayyum, owner of Crown Plaza and Wahid Khurshid Kunwar, director general (investment), EOBI, were not entitled to bail because they were ‘directly involved’ in the purchase of Crown Plaza located in sector F-7 Markaz of Islamabad.

As per assessment of NESPAK, value of the plaza in June 2012 was Rs626 million. The EOBI authorities, however, paid Rs1,002 to Qayyum.

According to the FIR, registered by the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) last year, Zafar Iqbal Gondal, former chairman EOBI and DG Investment Wahid Khurshid Kunwar “induced Abdul Qayyum into selling his property against handsome amount and asked him to give a bid of his own choice which will be approved, but he had to pay some percentage to the management of EOBI as kickbacks.”

The FIR alleged that under the deal, Gondal and his associates extorted Rs299.9 million as kickbacks from Qayyum.

The court further observed that Saqib and Mehmood were part of the said deal, but they were not directly involved.

Published in Dawn, July 12th, 2014

Opinion

Who bears the cost?

Who bears the cost?

This small window of low inflation should compel a rethink of how the authorities and employers understand the average household’s

Editorial

Internet restrictions
Updated 23 Dec, 2024

Internet restrictions

Notion that Pakistan enjoys unprecedented freedom of expression difficult to reconcile with the reality of restrictions.
Bangladesh reset
23 Dec, 2024

Bangladesh reset

THE vibes were positive during Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s recent meeting with Bangladesh interim leader Dr...
Leaving home
23 Dec, 2024

Leaving home

FROM asylum seekers to economic migrants, the continuing exodus from Pakistan shows mass disillusionment with the...
Military convictions
Updated 22 Dec, 2024

Military convictions

Pakistan’s democracy, still finding its feet, cannot afford such compromises on core democratic values.
Need for talks
22 Dec, 2024

Need for talks

FOR a long time now, the country has been in the grip of relentless political uncertainty, featuring the...
Vulnerable vaccinators
22 Dec, 2024

Vulnerable vaccinators

THE campaign to eradicate polio from Pakistan cannot succeed unless the safety of vaccinators and security personnel...