Two PTI workers question Imran’s call for civil disobedience

Published August 20, 2014
PTI Chairman Imran Khan.— AFP photo
PTI Chairman Imran Khan.— AFP photo

ISLAMABAD: Not only his rivals but also some of his staunch supporters have distanced themselves from Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan’s call for ‘civil disobedience’ and the removal of Pakistan Muslim League (PML-N) government.

Saeed Khurshid Ahmed, a PTI candidate for National Assembly seat NA-153 in the 2013 election, has conveyed his resentment to Imran Khan over his call for the ‘civil disobedience’.

In a letter addressed to the party chairman, Mr Ahmed stated: “I had joined PTI for the reason that this party believed in merit, institutional freedom, justice and the rule of law.”

Know more: Imran’s surprising call for civil disobedience

Criticising the stance of Mr Khan during the ongoing march, he said the party demand for the removal of the elected prime minister did not convince him as a party worker.

“I felt it my moral obligation to convey my opinion to the PTI leadership though I am not part of the committee dealing with the situation. Since we are seeking an unconstitutional change, it will be disastrous and will definitely lead to a political turmoil and anarchy,” the letter said.

“The public opinion graph shows a U-turn about our party’s vision and existence. We are sharply heading to be branded like a militant group and an anarchist party. The soft image of the party pursuing electoral reforms, institutional freedom, justice, rule of law and above all social, economical and educational reforms in the country seems to have changed.”

Mr Ahmed added: “I have been observing, since the beginning of the ‘Azadi’ march, that you have changed your statements and party position regarding the objectives of the march.

“You have won the confidence of some veteran leaders, such as Javed Hashmi, who joined you in the pursuit of changing the status quo.

“I must say in direct words that there is a disappointment amongst the majority of PTI supporters who don’t like violence, hate speeches, anarchy, insulting remarks against institutions, especially the judiciary, police and a retired army chief, etc.”

He wrote that Pakistan can’t afford to be a failed democracy or state and requested the party chief to withdraw his call for the civil disobedience decision.

Mr Ahmed was not alone in criticising his party chief for his current stance.

K. Asif, a former president of the Insaf Students Federation (ISF), who has been with Mr Khan for over a decade, also did not approve of the decision of his party chief.

Asif, who resigned from the post of the ISF president last year but retained the membership of the party, said that the current leadership of the party appeared to have forgotten its slogan of bringing a change in a positive manner.

He said newcomers had spoiled the image of the PTI by giving ill advices to Imran Khan.

Published in Dawn, August 20th, 2014

Opinion

Editorial

Geopolitical games
Updated 18 Dec, 2024

Geopolitical games

While Assad may be gone — and not many are mourning the end of his brutal rule — Syria’s future does not look promising.
Polio’s toll
18 Dec, 2024

Polio’s toll

MONDAY’s attacks on polio workers in Karak and Bannu that martyred Constable Irfanullah and wounded two ...
Development expenditure
18 Dec, 2024

Development expenditure

PAKISTAN’S infrastructure development woes are wide and deep. The country must annually spend at least 10pc of its...
Risky slope
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Risky slope

Inflation likely to see an upward trajectory once high base effect tapers off.
Digital ID bill
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Digital ID bill

Without privacy safeguards, a centralised digital ID system could be misused for surveillance.
Dangerous revisionism
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Dangerous revisionism

When hatemongers call for digging up every mosque to see what lies beneath, there is a darker agenda driving matters.