NEW YORK: A US judge has ruled that Manmohan Singh is immune from allegations that he “supported genocide of Sikhs” during his tenure as head of Indian government but does not enjoy “head of state immunity” for claims arising from his tenure as finance minister, from 1991 to 1996.

In his verdict, Judge James Boasberg of the District of Columbia said: “Although he is no longer a head of state, (Mr) Singh is entitled to residual immunity for acts taken in his official capacity as prime minister."

“Because such residual immunity does not cover actions (Mr) Singh pursued before taking (the) office, however, the allegations stemming from his time as finance minister survive.”

A US-based human rights group, the Sikhs for Justice (SFJ), and Inderjit Singh had alleged in the 2013 lawsuit that as finance minister Mr Singh “funded several counter-insurgency operations in Punjab in the 1990s, resulting in the extrajudicial killing of more than 100,000 Sikhs”.

According to the plaintiffs, during his tenure as prime minister, Mr Singh was “complicit in the torture and killing of hundreds of thousands of Sikhs and for shielding the perpetrators of the Sikhs’ genocide”.

During the course of the trial, the US government, although not a party in the litigation, filed a Suggestion of Immunity which claimed that Mr Singh, as the sitting prime minister, was entitled to ‘head of state’ immunity. Although at the time when the document was filed Mr Singh was indeed prime minister, he left the office three weeks later.

The plaintiffs subsequently said that Mr Singh was no longer entitled to immunity.

Judge Boasberg ruled that the US law barred former heads of state from being sued for actions they took while in office, but not for private acts or those taken in prior government posts.

“While (Mr) Singh’s alleged acts as finance minister are not ‘private’ per se, they did not occur in the course of his official duties as head of state,” he wrote in the verdict.

Describing the judgment as “a ray of hope” for the plaintiffs, Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, the SFJ’s legal adviser, said it marked the start of a long and uphill battle for making the former prime minister accountable for funding “counter-insurgency operations across India in which hundreds of thousands of Sikhs were kidnapped, murdered and buried in mass graves during the 1990s”.

Published in Dawn, August 21st, 2014

Opinion

From hard to harder

From hard to harder

Instead of ‘hard state’ turning even harder, citizens deserve a state that goes soft on them in delivering democratic and development aspirations.

Editorial

Canal unrest
Updated 03 Apr, 2025

Canal unrest

With rising water scarcity in Indus system, it is crucial to move towards a consensus-driven policymaking process.
Iran-US tension
03 Apr, 2025

Iran-US tension

THE Trump administration’s threats aimed at Iran do not bode well for global peace, and unless Washington changes...
Flights to history
03 Apr, 2025

Flights to history

MOHENJODARO could have been the forgotten gold we desperately need. Instead, this 5,000-year-old well of antiquity ...
Eid amidst crises
Updated 31 Mar, 2025

Eid amidst crises

Until the Muslim world takes practical steps to end these atrocities, these besieged populations will see no joy.
Women’s rights
Updated 01 Apr, 2025

Women’s rights

Such judgements, and others directly impacting women’s rights should be given more airtime in media.
Not helping
Updated 02 Apr, 2025

Not helping

If it's committed to peace in Balochistan, the state must draw a line between militancy and legitimate protest.