The SNP driving Scotland to edge of independence

Published September 4, 2014
Alex Salmond holds up cakes marked “Aye” during his visit to Brownings Bakers in Kilmarnock, Scotland, on Wednesday.—Reuters
Alex Salmond holds up cakes marked “Aye” during his visit to Brownings Bakers in Kilmarnock, Scotland, on Wednesday.—Reuters

LONDON: The Scottish National Party (SNP) has gone from being a fringe force to within touching distance of taking Scotland independent from Britain, its defining purpose, in 15 years.

The SNP has driven the campaigns first for a referendum and then for a “Yes” vote on Sept 18, when the country votes on whether to end the 300-year union.

To most Scots, the party means two things — First Minister Alex Salmond, the combative horse-racing fanatic who has led it on and off since 1990, and independence, at the party’s heart since its foundation 80 years ago.

Even if, as most opinion polls suggest, the SNP is defeated in the referendum, the party will still earn significantly more powers for Scotland.

“They’re either going to win narrowly, which is just a possibility, or they’re going to poll so high that the union is never going be the same again,” said Gerry Hassan, an academic and leading commentator on Scottish politics.

The opening of the Scottish Parliament in 1999 under Britain’s then prime minister Tony Blair gave the SNP its big boost.

Initially the second biggest party behind Blair’s Labour, by 2007, Salmond was leading a minority government in Edinburgh which became a majority administration in a surprise election win four years later.

The SNP has used the power the parliament has to set Scottish domestic policy by introducing measures such as free care for the elderly.

Political commentators say it has a “big tent” approach to politics but tends to be centre-left on social issues and centre-right on the economy.

“Alex Salmond is the glue which holds together quite a disparate party — it has left-wing voices, right-wing voices, everything in between,” said David Torrance, author of a biography of Salmond.

Women turned off?

The SNP’s core support comes from well-educated, middle class Scots, with strongest backing from older men.

This has prompted opponents to claim it struggles to attract women. Opinion polls suggest this is carrying through to the independence vote.

A YouGov poll released on Tuesday, which showed the “Yes” camp closing the gap on “No” campaigners, indicated that while more women were backing independence, the figure fell short of overall polling.

Some 42 per cent of women back independence against 58pc who are opposed. This compared to 47pc of all voters surveyed backing independence versus 53pc wanting to stay in Britain.

This is despite Salmond’s deputy, Nicola Sturgeon, taking a major role on the campaign trail.

One woman set to vote “No”, Mary Dickie, told AFP in Glasgow that she was put off by Salmond’s “arrogant” manner.

“I’m ashamed to say my view is coloured by Alex Salmond. I don’t like him at all,” the 69-year-old retired teacher added. James Kelly, who is leaning towards a “Yes” vote, added that he thought independence could bring more jobs to Scotland.

But of Salmond, the 60-year-old retired social care worker said: “He can’t give a straight answer”

‘Accidental’ referendum

Scotland is set to be granted greater devolved powers to set policy on domestic issues even if it votes “No”.

In a bid to weaken the case for independence, the British government passed a law in 2012 which will result in the biggest transfer of taxation powers to Scotland in 300 years if it votes “No”.

All three of Britain’s main political parties, including Prime Minister David Cameron’s Conservatives, have also pledged to devolve more powers on top of that.

The extent of these concessions is likely to depend on the size of the referendum “Yes” vote.

Hassan said the referendum was being held sooner than the SNP expected after the party won a surprise majority at the 2011 Scottish Parliament election and then faced pressure to deliver its defining policy pledge fast.

“One of the debates we have in Scotland is whether it was an accidental referendum,” he said. “This referendum has come ahead of Scottish public opinion.” Win or lose in two weeks’ time, the SNP, with Salmond at its helm, will still have forced a fundamental redefinition of Scotland’s relationship with Britain.—AFP

Published in Dawn, September 4th, 2014

Opinion

Editorial

Short-changed?
Updated 24 Nov, 2024

Short-changed?

As nations continue to argue, the international community must recognise that climate finance is not merely about numbers.
Overblown ‘threat’
24 Nov, 2024

Overblown ‘threat’

ON the eve of the PTI’s ‘do or die’ protest in the federal capital, there seemed to be little evidence of the...
Exclusive politics
24 Nov, 2024

Exclusive politics

THERE has been a gradual erasure of the voices of most marginalised groups from Pakistan’s mainstream political...
Counterterrorism plan
Updated 23 Nov, 2024

Counterterrorism plan

Lacunae in our counterterrorism efforts need to be plugged quickly.
Bullish stock market
23 Nov, 2024

Bullish stock market

NORMALLY, stock markets rise gradually. In recent months, however, Pakistan’s stock market has soared to one ...
Political misstep
Updated 23 Nov, 2024

Political misstep

To drag a critical ally like Saudi Arabia into unfounded conspiracies is detrimental to Pakistan’s foreign policy.