Musharraf treason case: Collective trial of accomplices sought

Published October 15, 2014
Police officers stand guard at the gate of the special court formed to try Pervez Musharraf for treason. — Photo by Reuters/File
Police officers stand guard at the gate of the special court formed to try Pervez Musharraf for treason. — Photo by Reuters/File

RAWALPINDI: A special Pakistani court, hearing the treason case against former military ruler Gen (retd) Pervez Musharraf, on Wednesday adjourned the hearing till Oct 21 after the defence presented arguments and demanded for a collective trial of all accomplices of the former president, DawnNews reported.

Counsel for Musharraf, Barrister Farogh Nasim apprised the bench, led by Justice Faisal Arab of Sindh High Court that the former military ruler had imposed an emergency and suspended the Constitution through the validation of then National Assembly and Cabinet.

Nasim further said that it would be a contradiction to Article 25 of the Constitution, if the accomplices and co-conspirators of the November 2007 emergency were not tried collectively and hence the case against Gen (retd) Musharraf should be withdrawn.

He said that Musharraf had only imposed the emergency on the advice given to him and the actual crime had been committed by other individuals.

The counsel for the former president alleged that the prosecution had not submitted the actual proof before the court and demanded that those named in the emergency order should also be summoned before the bench.

On this, Justice Faisal Arab said that if the prosecution had made the mistake of not including the names of the accomplices as accused in the case then what was the fault of the co-conspirators.

He added that the prosecution will have to answer that if a person who has committed a crime is provided shelter then should those providing shelter also be included within the domain of accomplices.

Farogh Nasim then argued that approval and support of the emergency move was actually validation of the act, and validating an act is tantamount to committing the crime itself.

Justice Faisal Arab inquired, “If someone commits a murder then should those supporting the murder also be punished for murder?”

Musharraf’s counsel replied that every crime had a separate nature, adding that abrogation of Constitution and treason cannot be committed by an individual alone. He said that according to the Constitution and criminal law, trial of accomplices was mandatory.

Nasim claimed that investigation of a lesser quality had taken place in the case and as per the treason act, all accused must be tried collectively. He added that the petition was retractable owing to the poor quality of investigation.

The court subsequently adjourned the hearing till October 21, during which head prosecutor Advocate Akram Sheikh would present his arguments.

Opinion

Editorial

Trump 2.0
Updated 07 Nov, 2024

Trump 2.0

It remains to be seen how his promises to bring ‘peace’ to Middle East reconcile with his blatantly pro-Israel bias.
Fait accompli
07 Nov, 2024

Fait accompli

A SLEW of secretively conceived and hastily enacted legislation has achieved its intended result: the powers of the...
IPP contracts
07 Nov, 2024

IPP contracts

THE government expects the ongoing ‘negotiations’ with power producers aimed at revising the terms of sovereign...
Rushed legislation
Updated 06 Nov, 2024

Rushed legislation

For all its stress on "supremacy of parliament", the ruling coalition has wasted no opportunity to reiterate where its allegiances truly lie.
Jail reform policy
06 Nov, 2024

Jail reform policy

THE state is making a fresh attempt to improve conditions in Pakistan’s penitentiaries by developing a national...
BISP overhaul
06 Nov, 2024

BISP overhaul

IT has emerged that the spouses of over 28,500 Sindh government employees have been illicitly benefiting from BISP....