IHC seeks AGP's opinion on admissibility of Zahid Hamid's petition

Published December 8, 2014
Zahid Hamid. — Photo courtesy: Pakistan Council for Science and Technology.
Zahid Hamid. — Photo courtesy: Pakistan Council for Science and Technology.

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Monday issued a notice to Attorney General of Pakistan and has asked for his opinion on December 12 regarding a petition filed by Zahid Hamid against a special court order terming him ‘abettor’ in the Musharraf treason case.

The bench headed by Justice Athar Minallah resumed the hearing over a petition filed by the former minister for science and technology and also upheld the objections which were put on Hamid's petition by the Islamabad High Court registrar.

Giving his remarks Justice Minallah said the powers of the special court were equal to that of high court. He added that the interim order of a special court could not be challenged in a high court.

The court sought the opinion of Attorney General Salman Aslam Butt on whether the petition submitted by Zahid Hamid was admissible or not and adjourned the next hearing until December 12.

Zahid Hamid, the erstwhile federal minister for science and technology, has challenged a special court verdict that ordered the government to include him as one of the abettors in the treason case against former military ruler Pervez Musharraf.

In his petition before the Islamabad High Court, Mr Hamid – who was the law minister in Musharraf’s cabinet when the former military ruler imposed a state of emergency on November 3, 2007 – not only distanced himself from the act itself, but also insisted on a ‘solo trial’ for his former boss.

Mr Hamid had resigned from his cabinet position when the special court ordered he be tried as an abettor, on Nov 21. The order also implicated former prime minister Shaukat Aziz and former chief justice Abdul Hameed Dogar.

A petition filed through his counsel, Khawaja Haris Ahmed, has been placed before the IHC. But the registrar’s office has raised certain objections on the petition, arguing that the high court lacks jurisdiction to hear this matter. However, the petition has been fixed before Justice Athar Minallah as an ‘objection case’.

Must Read

Opinion

Editorial

The ban question
Updated 02 Dec, 2024

The ban question

Parties that want PTI to be banned don't seem to realise they're veering away from the very ‘democratic’ credentials they claim to possess.
5G charade
Updated 02 Dec, 2024

5G charade

What use is faster internet when the state is determined to police every byte of data its citizens consume?
Syria offensive
Updated 02 Dec, 2024

Syria offensive

If Al Qaeda’s ideological allies establish a strong foothold in Syria, it will fuel transnational terrorism.
Flying ban reversal
Updated 01 Dec, 2024

Flying ban reversal

Only the naive can expect the reinstatement of European operations to help restore PIA’s profitability.
Kurram conflict
01 Dec, 2024

Kurram conflict

DESPITE a ceasefire being in place, violence has continued in Kurram tribal district. The latest round of bloodshed...
World AIDS Day
01 Dec, 2024

World AIDS Day

IT is a travesty that, decades after HIV/AIDS first perplexed medics, awareness about the disease remains low in...