Honey, there’s a nuclear bomb in the yard

Published December 11, 2014
US aircraft like these B-52 bombers routinely carried fully-primed nuclear weapons during the Cold War.—AFP
US aircraft like these B-52 bombers routinely carried fully-primed nuclear weapons during the Cold War.—AFP

VIENNA: When a nuclear bomb landed in the Gregg yard in South Carolina in 1958, it left a big crater, killed a few chickens, caused the family minor injuries and wrecked their Chevrolet.

Luckily, the device that had fallen out of a B-47 bomber after Captain Bruce Kulka accidentally grabbed a lever opening the bomb bay — almost falling out himself — was not fully armed with a fissile core.

But other US aircraft routinely flew carrying fully-primed nuclear weapons, and the incident, as highlighted in this week’s international conference on nuclear weapons in Vienna, was far from isolated.

“We were lucky to get out of the Cold War without a nuclear detonation,” US author Eric Schlosser, who recounts this episode and many others in his recent book Command and Control, told the gathering.

“The problem with luck is that eventually it runs out,” said Schlosser, who spent six years researching his book, sifting through thousands of pages of documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act and interviewing a range of senior figures.

In another case in 1961, a B-52 bomber broke up in the air and went into a spin. The resulting centrifugal forces pulled a lanyard that released a fully operational hydrogen bomb — a super-powerful nuclear bomb — over North Carolina.

“There was one switch in that weapon that prevented the full-scale detonation of a hydrogen bomb hundreds of times more powerful than the Hiroshima bomb” dropped by the US on Japan on 1945, Schlosser said.

And in 1968, a B-52 bomber carrying four hydrogen bombs crashed near the Thule air base in Greenland.

The conventional explosives surrounding the nuclear core exploded, but a full nuclear explosion was averted, although radioactive plutonium was dispersed in the area and part of one of the bombs was never recovered.

In 1980 Zbigniew Brzezinski, former US national security adviser, was woken up at 2.30am to be told of 220 — then corrected to 2,200 — incoming Russian nuclear missiles.

Brzezinski was about to phone president Jimmy Carter, and US bomber crews had already started their engines, when the all-clear came through. The false alarm was triggered by a faulty microchip costing less than 50 cents.

Thing of the past?

Since the collapse of the Soviet Union 25 years ago, nuclear arsenals have been slashed, and technological advances and security improvements have reduced the chances of an accident.

The US says its missiles are pointed to land in the middle of the ocean.

Its combat aircraft no longer routinely have nuclear bombs on board.

But there are believed to remain 16,300 nuclear weapons worldwide in the hands of nine countries, 1,800 of them ready to be launched at short notice, and experts say that major causes for concern persist.

The nuclear warheads themselves may be more modern, but the equipment that carries them — missiles, aircraft and submarines — are antiquated, and incidents still happen.

In France, for example, there have been security breaches at the Isle Longue nuclear submarine base, and in 2009 two British and a French nuclear sub reportedly collided, said Jean-Marie Collin, head of a group representing 20 French MPs calling for disarmament.

Britain’s Daily Express reported this week that there have been 44 fires on board Royal Navy submarines in the past four years.

But most worryingly, said Bruce Blair, a former US control officer for nuclear missiles now at Princeton University, the time needed to deploy a nuclear weapon is being cut, putting them on dangerous “hair-trigger readiness”.

“Russia has shortened the launch time by automating the firing process.

High command posts in the Moscow area need only seconds to directly fire missiles out of silos as far away as Siberia,” Blair said.

Cyber danger

This in turn increases the risk from another area barely known about in the Cold War — cyber attacks, said Camille M. Francois, an expert in the field at Harvard Law School’s Berkman Center for Internet and Society.

With their high level of automation, “nuclear assets are by their nature extremely vulnerable to cyber attack,” Francois said.

And in addition, she told AFP, policymakers still have something of a “1980s mentality”, focusing on the idea of a lone hacker — like in the 1983 movie WarGames” — and believing that cyber attacks can only come via the internet.

“It’s not kids anymore, it is states investing very heavily in cyber warfare. This is the new battlefield, the fifth domain of war,” she said.

“Nuclear weapons are the most dangerous weapons ever made,” Schlosser told AFP. “This technology has never been under our control since the very beginning.”—AFP

Published in Dawn, December 11th, 2014

Opinion

Editorial

China security ties
Updated 14 Nov, 2024

China security ties

If China's security concerns aren't addressed satisfactorily, it may affect bilateral ties. CT cooperation should be pursued instead of having foreign forces here.
Steep price
14 Nov, 2024

Steep price

THE Hindu Kush-Himalayan region is in big trouble. A new study unveiled at the ongoing COP29 reveals that if high...
A high-cost plan
14 Nov, 2024

A high-cost plan

THE government has approved an expensive plan for FBR in the hope of tackling its deep-seated inefficiencies. The...
United stance
Updated 13 Nov, 2024

United stance

It would've been better if the OIC-Arab League summit had announced practical measures to punish Israel.
Unscheduled visit
13 Nov, 2024

Unscheduled visit

Unusual IMF visit shows the lender will closely watch implementation of programme goals to prevent it from derailing.
Bara’s businesswomen
13 Nov, 2024

Bara’s businesswomen

Bara’s brave women have proven that with the right support, societal barriers can be overcome.