Military courts: How the reluctant were brought around

Published December 26, 2014
File photo shows COAS Gen Raheel Sharif during a meeting with parliamentary leaders. — Courtesy: Prime Minister's Office facebook page
File photo shows COAS Gen Raheel Sharif during a meeting with parliamentary leaders. — Courtesy: Prime Minister's Office facebook page

ISLAMABAD: On an assurance by Army Chief Gen Raheel Sharif that only “jet black terrorists” who have committed violent crimes will be tried by the proposed special trial courts, reluctant parties like the MQM, ANP and PPP agreed to support the move.

Addressing some of the reservations expressed by politicians, Gen Sharif explained that the military had its own legal system with certain checks and balances which guard against misuse of authority by the officers. Moreover, the army chief added, “the proposed military courts will only take the cases approved by the federal government”.

Military authorities use the term, jet black terrorists, for hardened criminals.

Also read: Political leaders reach consensus on military courts

Sharing with Dawn proceedings of Wednesday’s marathon meeting of parliamentary parties, a participant who didn’t want to be quoted said that during an initial part of the sitting, the MQM expressed its discomfort over the prospect of military courts. The PPP and ANP, too, opposed the proposal.

Senator Aitzaz Ahsan of PPP argued that such courts had no place in a working constitutional democracy. Moreover, he said, the PPP had always opposed formation of such courts as the arrangement had no place in the constitution.

It was Senator Mushahid Hussain of PML-Q who took the dissenting parties head on. Mr Hussain’s argument was that the late Zulfikar Ali Bhutto assumed the charge of chief martial law administrator in Dec 1971 because it was a need of the hour. “We have unprecedented circumstances now which call for unprecedented measures.”

Senator Hussain also recalled how anti-terrorism courts set up during the 90s and the recently promulgated Pakistan Protection Ordinance had failed to deliver. “Therefore we have to go for out-of-the-box solution,” Senator Mushahid contended, recalling that the US had also adopted similar measures after 9/11.

Senator Rehman Malik, the former interior minister, however, enthusiastically spoke for the military courts, and according to a government source he also played a key role in convincing Asif Ali Zardari over a telephone call about the need for drastic measures. Syed Khurshid Shah, the Leader of Opposition, was also in favour of the move.

In his remarks, Hasil Bizenjo said setting up of the military courts was being done by a democratically elected government through a constitutional amendment, not by a military dictator, therefore, “we should be rest assured, they will operate within given rules and regulations.”

Aftab Sherpao also supported the decision.

PTI shows caution

The PTI leaders, according to the participant, adopted a wait and see attitude. Once he realised that majority of the participants were in favour of the idea, PTI chairman Imran Khan came out in support of the proposal. However, Mr Khan suggested the government take immediate measures to ban all armed groups across the country regardless of their party affiliations.

Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif willingly accepted it.

“If we do not set up special trial courts supervised by military officers, chances of extrajudicial killings will increase manifold,” was one of the arguments which were presented during the 10-hour long talkathon of the heads of parliamentary parties that eventually approved formation of military courts to try terror suspects.

It was the MQM which throughout the meeting opposed the decision. The party’s main concern was that since it had suffered in the past because of such measures, it couldn’t support the suggestion. However, it was Prime Minister Sharif, supported by the army chief, who made several attempts to allay MQM’s apprehensions.

More than one telephone call was made to Muttahida supremo Altaf Hussain to bring him on board. Senator Ishaq Dar assured him the government would provide whatever guarantees he sought against the misuse of military courts.

The ANP, another party which didn’t like the idea of military courts, wasted no time after the prime minister addressed Ghulam Ahmad Bilour in a sombre tone: “If we fail this time, neither mine nor your children will forgive us. The ANP has suffered a lot at the hands of these terrorists. So let’s bring them to book.”

Mr Bilour, along with his party senator Afrasiab Khattak, left the room and within no time took the consent of party chief Asfandyar Wali Khan, who was not present at the meeting.

According to an official statement, the prime minister has convened a meeting on Friday (today) to discuss implementation of the 20-point resolution on anti-terror measures. On Thursday, Mr Sharif remained busy in consultations with his political and legal advisers to find out how quickly the government could act upon the recommendations which he highlighted one by one in his speech late on Wednesday night.

Published in Dawn, December 26th, 2014

Opinion

Editorial

Geopolitical games
Updated 18 Dec, 2024

Geopolitical games

While Assad may be gone — and not many are mourning the end of his brutal rule — Syria’s future does not look promising.
Polio’s toll
18 Dec, 2024

Polio’s toll

MONDAY’s attacks on polio workers in Karak and Bannu that martyred Constable Irfanullah and wounded two ...
Development expenditure
18 Dec, 2024

Development expenditure

PAKISTAN’S infrastructure development woes are wide and deep. The country must annually spend at least 10pc of its...
Risky slope
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Risky slope

Inflation likely to see an upward trajectory once high base effect tapers off.
Digital ID bill
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Digital ID bill

Without privacy safeguards, a centralised digital ID system could be misused for surveillance.
Dangerous revisionism
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Dangerous revisionism

When hatemongers call for digging up every mosque to see what lies beneath, there is a darker agenda driving matters.