SC takes up petition on repatriation

Published January 22, 2015
Urdu-speaking Pakistani women stranded in Bangladesh are seen in Dhaka.—Reuters/File
Urdu-speaking Pakistani women stranded in Bangladesh are seen in Dhaka.—Reuters/File
An Urdu speaker stranded Pakistani woman cries in Dhaka, Bangladesh as police arrest her brother.—Reuters/File
An Urdu speaker stranded Pakistani woman cries in Dhaka, Bangladesh as police arrest her brother.—Reuters/File

ISLAMABAD: The government sought on Wednesday time for submitting reply to the contentions raised in a 2009 petition seeking repatriation of about 237,000 Pakistanis stranded in Bangladesh.

Attorney General Salman Aslam Butt asked for time during the hearing of the case by a three-judge Supreme Court bench headed by Chief Justice Nasir-ul-Mulk.

The petition was moved by Advocate Rashid-ul-Haq Qazi on behalf of the Stranded Pakistanis General Repatriation Committee and the Organisation for Repatriation of Stranded Pakistanis in Bangladesh.

The court had on May 13 last accepted the petition for regular hearing after Mr Qazi said these stranded people were citizens of Pakistan either by birth or by descent.

The petitioner pleaded that after the dismemberment of Pakistan and emergence of a new state of Bangladesh, the two governments had committed to repatriating the stranded people to their countries and, therefore, the stranded Pakistani families were liable to be repatriated to their homeland.

The Pakistan government had no right under the constitution and the law to withhold the repatriation of its citizens, commonly known as Biharis, the petition said, adding that the government was bound under an April 19, 1974 tripartite agreement between India, Pakistan and Bangladesh to normalise relations in the subcontinent which also included the repatriation of stranded people as early as possible.

The agreement was partially implemented when 325 stranded Pakistanis were brought back on Jan 10, 1993 and rehabilitated in Punjab’s Mian Chunnu and Muzaffargarh cities by the then Nawaz Sharif government.

The petition argued that leaving the rest of Pakistanis in Bangladesh would amount to gross discrimination and violation of Article 25 of the Constitution which called for equality of citizens. The government was also depriving them of their constitutional fundamental rights, it emphasised.

The petition also requested the court to order the government to look after the stranded Pakistanis living in camps and provide food and medicines till the time they were repatriated to Pakistan.

It contended that the government was legally bound to complete housing programmes to accommodate the repatriated citizens and in case of non-compliance it would be grossly breaching the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 4, 9, 19, 23 and 25 of the constitution.

Published in Dawn January 22nd , 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Who bears the cost?

Who bears the cost?

This small window of low inflation should compel a rethink of how the authorities and employers understand the average household’s

Editorial

Internet restrictions
Updated 23 Dec, 2024

Internet restrictions

Notion that Pakistan enjoys unprecedented freedom of expression difficult to reconcile with the reality of restrictions.
Bangladesh reset
23 Dec, 2024

Bangladesh reset

THE vibes were positive during Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s recent meeting with Bangladesh interim leader Dr...
Leaving home
23 Dec, 2024

Leaving home

FROM asylum seekers to economic migrants, the continuing exodus from Pakistan shows mass disillusionment with the...
Military convictions
Updated 22 Dec, 2024

Military convictions

Pakistan’s democracy, still finding its feet, cannot afford such compromises on core democratic values.
Need for talks
22 Dec, 2024

Need for talks

FOR a long time now, the country has been in the grip of relentless political uncertainty, featuring the...
Vulnerable vaccinators
22 Dec, 2024

Vulnerable vaccinators

THE campaign to eradicate polio from Pakistan cannot succeed unless the safety of vaccinators and security personnel...