SC unhappy over delays in case about Pakistanis stranded in Bangladesh

Published February 19, 2015
An Urdu speaker stranded Pakistani woman cries in Dhaka, Bangladesh as police arrest her brother.—Reuters/File
An Urdu speaker stranded Pakistani woman cries in Dhaka, Bangladesh as police arrest her brother.—Reuters/File

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court took exception on Wednesday to failure of the Foreign Office and the cabinet division to answer contentions raised in a 2009 petition seeking repatriation of around 237,000 Pakistanis stranded in Bangladesh.

A three-judge bench headed by Justice Amir Hani Muslim took up the petition moved by Advocate Rashidul Haq Qazi, representing the Stranded Pakistanis General Repatriation Committee and the Organisation for Repatriation of Stranded Pakistanis in Bangladesh.

Also read: SC takes up petition on repatriation

The court ordered the ministries concerned to submit their comments on the petition within a week and warned that otherwise their secretaries would be called to explain the delay during the next hearing.

Deputy Attorney General Sohail Mahmood told the court that despite having been contacted several times both the FO and the cabinet division had failed to provide a reply, while the interior ministry had stated that the foreign ministry would be in a better position to respond to the contentions.

The interior ministry explained that under Section 16-A of the Pakistan Citizenship Act, 1951 all persons residing in those territories which before Dec 16, 1971 constituted the province of East Pakistan and were residing there since that day voluntarily or otherwise should cease to be citizens of Pakistan.

It said those who had not been repatriated before March 18, 1978, when the section was introduced, but whose repatriation had been agreed to by the government continued to be citizens of Pakistan under Clause iv of its Sub Section 1.

Cabinet Division Director Muhammad Aftab informed the court that a Bangladesh high court had declared stranded Pakistanis as citizens of Bangladesh in 2003 and that country’s supreme court had also ratified it.

The bench asked him to file written reply in this regard and adjourned the hearing for an indefinite period.

Published in Dawn February 19th , 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Eid amidst crises
31 Mar, 2025

Eid amidst crises

WHILE the more fortunate will be sharing the joys of Eidul Fitr with their families, many in the Muslim world will ...
Women’s rights
31 Mar, 2025

Women’s rights

PAKISTAN’S legal system has issued some important rulings in recent days concerning women, which deserve more...
Not helping
31 Mar, 2025

Not helping

THE continued detention of Baloch Yakjehti Committee leaders — including Dr Mahrang Baloch in Quetta and Sammi ...
Hard habits
Updated 30 Mar, 2025

Hard habits

Their job is to ensure that social pressures do not build to the point where problems like militancy and terrorism become a national headache.
Dreams of gold
30 Mar, 2025

Dreams of gold

PROSPECTS of the Reko Diq project taking off soon seem to have brightened lately following the completion of the...
No invitation
30 Mar, 2025

No invitation

FOR all of Pakistan’s hockey struggles, including their failure to qualify for the Olympics and World Cup as well...