LHC orders cantonment polls on party basis

Published March 31, 2015
Lahore High Court declares non-party local government elections being held in cantonment areas as unconstitutional. — AFP/File
Lahore High Court declares non-party local government elections being held in cantonment areas as unconstitutional. — AFP/File

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has declared that non-party local government elections being held in cantonment areas are unconstitutional and asked the Election Commission to hold the polls on party basis.

In a short order issued on Monday on several petitions, Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah ruled: “Sections 14 and 61 of Cantonment Local Government (Elections) Ordinance, 2002 are struck down as being ultra vires to Article 17(2) of the Constitution.”

The judge relied on several reported judgments of superior courts, including the Pakistan People’s Party vs Government of Punjab and others (PLD 2014 Lahore 330), and Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif vs President of Pakistan and others (PLD 1993 Supreme Court 473).

He ordered the federal government and the ECP to issue directives to returning officers to accept nomination papers on party basis by Tuesday in accordance with the election schedule notified on March 20.

The candidates who had already filed their nomination papers would have the facility to revise them and indicate their political party, if any, the order said.

Justice Shah also said the elections for the cantonment local governments should be held as scheduled.

The petitions were filed by the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf’s Punjab leaders, Advocate Azhar Siddique, Advocate Ramzan Chaudhry, Advocate Fayaz Ahmad Mehar and others.

They pleaded that the Sections 14 and 61 of the 2002 Ordinance denied political identity to elected representatives of local governments. They said that without such an identity, the capacity of an elected representative to assess and express preferences for policymaking and executive action was greatly impaired. The petitioners asked the court to declare the non-party elections unconstitutional and strike down the impugned provisions of the ordinance for being contrary to fundamental rights.

Published in Dawn, March 31st, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Caught in between
Updated 13 Apr, 2025

Caught in between

In the absence of a trade agreement, under WTO rules, Pakistan cannot reduce duty rates for the US without doing the same for other countries.
Spirit of giving
13 Apr, 2025

Spirit of giving

THE recent declaration by ulema affirming that organ donation after death is not only permissible but an act of...
Targeting dissent
13 Apr, 2025

Targeting dissent

THE recent notice sent by the FIA to former senator Farhatullah Babar is deeply troubling — and revealing....
Stranded Afghans
Updated 12 Apr, 2025

Stranded Afghans

It is both unfair and dangerous that Afghan people’s immediate well-being has been left entirely to Pakistan to consider.
Peaceful protest
12 Apr, 2025

Peaceful protest

A CONCLAVE of local divines that had gathered in Islamabad on Thursday have made two important points: firstly, that...
Squash hopes
12 Apr, 2025

Squash hopes

IT was a monumental triumph: Noor Zaman came back from the brink to clinch the Under-23 World Squash Championships...