Banks and madressahs

Published April 3, 2015
In the absence of bank accounts, seminaries here are likely to continue using individual accounts, or to deal in cash. ——AFP/File
In the absence of bank accounts, seminaries here are likely to continue using individual accounts, or to deal in cash. ——AFP/File

MADRESSAHS have complained to the government that banks are reluctant to open accounts for them for fear of becoming entangled in a possible illicit activity investigation.

The complaints were shared with the secretary, religious affairs, who conveyed them at a PAC meeting, in the context of an ongoing effort by the government to get all seminaries to register themselves and make disclosures about their source of funding.

The effort includes getting the seminaries to fill out a form requiring them to disclose their assets, number of vehicles and bank account information as well as the sources from where funds will arrive into the account.

There are five Wafaq boards, and at least two of them have reportedly refused to comply with the instructions to fill out the forms. They argue in return that the procedures being demanded of them are cumbersome, and that banks routinely refuse to open accounts for madressahs.

The government has not specified what penalties will apply to those seminaries that do not comply with the new registration procedures, and the issue seems to have reached an impasse.

At this point, it is not clear whether or not the complaints of the seminaries against the banks are valid, but given that Interior Minister Nisar Ali Khan has himself stated on record that 10pc of all madressahs could be involved in terror-related activities, without specifying which ones, the banks have grounds to be cautious in dealing with all of them.

How are they supposed to know whether or not a particular applicant belongs to the 10pc that is allegedly involved in terror-related activity? In the absence of proper bank accounts, seminaries here are likely to continue with the existing practice of using individual accounts of people working for them to transact their finances, or to deal entirely in cash.

This complicates the task of tracking and monitoring their funds. It is bad enough that the government has had such a complicated time figuring out how to go about the rudimentary job of registering all seminaries, and acquiring some knowledge of how many are operating around the country.

How are we to expect that the government will be able to conduct higher levels of regulation, such as curricular reform and tracking sources of funding? Clearly, more vigorous efforts are required from the government.

Leaving the entire exercise to be carried out by the religious affairs ministry alone is not going to be enough.

Published in Dawn, April 3rd, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Military option
Updated 21 Nov, 2024

Military option

While restoring peace is essential, addressing Balochistan’s socioeconomic deprivation is equally important.
HIV/AIDS disaster
21 Nov, 2024

HIV/AIDS disaster

A TORTUROUS sense of déjà vu is attached to the latest health fiasco at Multan’s Nishtar Hospital. The largest...
Dubious pardon
21 Nov, 2024

Dubious pardon

IT is disturbing how a crime as grave as custodial death has culminated in an out-of-court ‘settlement’. The...
Islamabad protest
Updated 20 Nov, 2024

Islamabad protest

As Nov 24 draws nearer, both the PTI and the Islamabad administration must remain wary and keep within the limits of reason and the law.
PIA uncertainty
20 Nov, 2024

PIA uncertainty

THE failed attempt to privatise the national flag carrier late last month has led to a fierce debate around the...
T20 disappointment
20 Nov, 2024

T20 disappointment

AFTER experiencing the historic high of the One-day International series triumph against Australia, Pakistan came...