SC allows govt to resubmit amended appeal against IHC verdict on Qadri plea

Published April 21, 2015
“The high court judgment has raised many legal questions like should the culprit be booked under terrorism laws for murdering the governor of a province,” Justice Khan observed while postponing the proceedings to May 14. — Online/file
“The high court judgment has raised many legal questions like should the culprit be booked under terrorism laws for murdering the governor of a province,” Justice Khan observed while postponing the proceedings to May 14. — Online/file

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court allowed the federal government on Monday to resubmit an amended appeal against the March 9 judgment of the Islamabad High Court accepting Mumtaz Qadri’s plea to annul a provision of the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA).

A two-judge SC bench headed by Justice Dost Mohammad Khan decided to jointly take up the appeals of the federal government as well as Mumtaz Qadri, who has been sentenced to death for killing former Punjab governor Salman Taseer in Islamabad on Jan 4, 2011.

“The high court judgment has raised many legal questions like should the culprit be booked under terrorism laws for murdering the governor of a province,” Justice Khan observed while postponing the proceedings to May 14.

The IHC had dismissed Qadri’s petition against the award of death sentence under the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC), but accepted his application to declare Section 7 of the ATA void. The section provides for punishment of death for committing acts of terrorism.

The high court had observed that none of the prosecution witnesses, except one, and neither the investigating officer nor the prosecution evidence suggested that Qadri’s act amounted to an attempt to create panic, to intimidate and terrorise the public, or to create a sense of fear and insecurity among the public.

Qadri later filed an appeal in the apex court against the IHC verdict through his counsel Mian Nazeer Akhtar. It contended that the case did not fall under Section 302 of the PPC which envisaged capital punishment for intention to murder; rather Section 302(b) which deals with punishment for life imprisonment should have been applied.

Lahore High Court’s former chief justice Khawaja Mohammad Sharif, who is defending Qadri voluntarily, had told reporters that the award of death sentence was not in accordance with law and the Constitution because the murder was caused by provocation.

The government’s application filed through the interior ministry had challenged the high court’s order of omitting the ATA’s Section 7.

On April 8, the interior ministry moved an application requesting the Supreme Court to give it one week to file a proper appeal, along with paper books, because a 30-day period for moving appeals against the judgment was approaching.

The court asked the government to submit a proper petition so that it could be taken up, along with the appeal of Qadri, on May 14.

Published in Dawn, April 21st, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Islamabad march
Updated 27 Nov, 2024

Islamabad march

WITH emotions running high, chaos closes in. As these words were being written, rumours and speculation were all...
Policing the internet
27 Nov, 2024

Policing the internet

IT is chilling to witness how Pakistan — a nation that embraced the freedoms of modern democracy, and the tech ...
Correcting sports priorities
27 Nov, 2024

Correcting sports priorities

IT has been a lingering battle that has cast a shadow over sports in Pakistan: who are the national sports...
Kurram ceasefire
Updated 26 Nov, 2024

Kurram ceasefire

DESPITE efforts by the KP government to bring about a ceasefire in Kurram tribal district, the bloodletting has...
Hollow victory
26 Nov, 2024

Hollow victory

THE conclusion of COP29 in Baku has left developing nations — struggling with the mounting costs of climate...
Infrastructure schemes
26 Nov, 2024

Infrastructure schemes

THE government’s decision to finance priority PSDP schemes on a three-year rolling basis is a significant step...