NA-122 decision

Published September 2, 2015

ELECTION Tribunal Judge Kazim Ali Malik announced his decision in the case of NA-122, de-seating Sirdar Ayaz Sadiq. This has triggered a lot of discussion as expected on TV talk shows.

What is surprising is that PML-N ministers in the federal and Punjab cabinets have started directly accusing the judge, declaring the judgement as well as the judge to be biased.

Rana Sanaullah has even accused him of carrying a grudge against his party for long and that the judge wanted a ticket for his son for contesting an election on the platform of the party from Khushab.

It appears to be a simple case of contempt of court since a tribunal also carries the same status as that of a court.

The PML-N has the option to challenge the decision of the tribunal in the Supreme Court. They should not have given such statements.

Abdul Qayum Khan

Bahrain

Published in Dawn, September 2nd, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Democracy in peril
21 Sep, 2024

Democracy in peril

WHO says the doctrine of necessity lies dead and buried? In the hands of the incumbent regime, it has merely taken...
Far from finish line
21 Sep, 2024

Far from finish line

FROM six cases in the first half of the year, Pakistan has now gone to 18 polio cases. Of the total, 13 have been...
Brutal times
21 Sep, 2024

Brutal times

IT seems that there is no space left for the law to take its course. Vigilantes lurk in the safest spaces, the...
What now?
20 Sep, 2024

What now?

Govt's actions could turn the reserved seats verdict into a major clash between institutions. It is a risky and unfortunate escalation.
IHK election farce
20 Sep, 2024

IHK election farce

WHILE India will be keen to trumpet the holding of elections in held Kashmir as a return to ‘normalcy’, things...
Donating organs
20 Sep, 2024

Donating organs

CERTAIN philanthropic practices require a more scientific temperament than ours to flourish. Deceased organ donation...