Thai military council rejects new draft constitution

Published September 7, 2015
Members of the Thai National Reform Council (NRC) applaud after the vote for the draft of the new constitution at Parliament. ─ AFP/File
Members of the Thai National Reform Council (NRC) applaud after the vote for the draft of the new constitution at Parliament. ─ AFP/File

BANGKOK: A council appointed by Thailand’s junta rejected on Sunday a draft constitution, a move expected to delay a return to democracy following last year’s military coup.

Critics had pilloried the document as divisive, anti-democratic and aimed at prolonging military rule. But its rejection in a vote by the National Reform Council (NRC) means the painstaking process of drafting a charter will have to start again, potentially pushing back the timetable for elections to 2017.

Of the 240 NRC members who voted, 135 were against the document and 105 in favour.

“Those in favour were less than half of NRC members; it means this NRC meeting has voted against” the charter, NRC chairman Tienchai Kiranan said in a televised count.

The army seized power from an elected government in May last year, promising to calm the country after years of street protests and acrimony by political rivals.

The junta has said a new charter — Thailand’s 20th since it abandoned absolute monarchy in 1932 — holds the key to bridging those divides before democratic elections can be held.

For years the kingdom has been split between pro-democracy supporters of ex-premier Thaksin Shinawatra’s populist parties and a conservative, royalist elite backed by the military and judiciary.

Shinawatra-backed parties have won every election since 2001 but have been ousted by two coups and have seen the removal of three prime ministers by the courts.

Mr Thaksin’s sister Yingluck Shinawatra was removed by a court shortly before the May 2014 coup toppled the remnants of her administration.

Opponents of the charter see it as a blatant attempt to permanently entrench the military’s political power and say it will prevent genuine democracy from taking root.

They point to Section 260 that allows the military to replace any elected government with an appointed 22-member “crisis” panel at any time in the five years after the charter is enacted — if unrest or political deadlock, as the military sees it, requires such a move.

The panel would be stacked with military top brass and other unelected officials, effectively guaranteeing the army’s grip on power.

Ahead of Sunday’s vote the toppled Peau Thai party labelled the charter as “dictatorial” saying it would destroy democracy and plunge the kingdom into even “deeper political polarisation”.

Published in Dawn, September 7th, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Who bears the cost?

Who bears the cost?

This small window of low inflation should compel a rethink of how the authorities and employers understand the average household’s

Editorial

Internet restrictions
Updated 23 Dec, 2024

Internet restrictions

Notion that Pakistan enjoys unprecedented freedom of expression difficult to reconcile with the reality of restrictions.
Bangladesh reset
23 Dec, 2024

Bangladesh reset

THE vibes were positive during Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s recent meeting with Bangladesh interim leader Dr...
Leaving home
23 Dec, 2024

Leaving home

FROM asylum seekers to economic migrants, the continuing exodus from Pakistan shows mass disillusionment with the...
Military convictions
Updated 22 Dec, 2024

Military convictions

Pakistan’s democracy, still finding its feet, cannot afford such compromises on core democratic values.
Need for talks
22 Dec, 2024

Need for talks

FOR a long time now, the country has been in the grip of relentless political uncertainty, featuring the...
Vulnerable vaccinators
22 Dec, 2024

Vulnerable vaccinators

THE campaign to eradicate polio from Pakistan cannot succeed unless the safety of vaccinators and security personnel...