NA-122 deseating case: Ayaz Sadiq approaches SC over tribunal’s verdict

Published September 7, 2015
The former NA Speaker said “election tribunal's impugned order was against facts and relevant laws”.  —File
The former NA Speaker said “election tribunal's impugned order was against facts and relevant laws”. —File

LAHORE: Former National Assembly Speaker and PML-N leader Sardar Ayaz Sadiq approached the Supreme Court against the election tribunal’s NA-122 case verdict which deseated him as the NA Speaker and parliamentarian.

In an appeal filed at the Supreme Court’s Lahore registry on Monday through counsel Khawaja Saeeduz Zafar, the former NA Speaker said “election tribunal's impugned order was against facts and relevant laws”.

Sadiq said the tribunal failed to decide the issue of maintainability of Imran Khan's election petition even after recording evidence despite his interim orders in this regard.

Know more: NA-122 election tribunal deseats Ayaz Sadiq, orders re-polling

He said the tribunal also failed to note that the election petition was not verified as mandated in Section 55 of Representation of Peoples Act (ROPA) 1976 and thus deserved to be dismissed under section 63 of the ROPA.

Ayaz Sadiq further said that the tribunal found no evidence of corrupt or illegal practices. “But despite it, the tribunal did not hold that no case had been made out”.

“The tribunal noted that a number of (alleged) procedural lapses on the part of polling staff but did not even attempt to determine how such lapses materially affected the election result. The tribunal could not therefore, declare the election to be void as a whole in terms of section 70 (1) of ROPA 1976,” he added.

The former lawmaker submitted that the impugned order was based on misreading and non-reading of relevant evidence, incorrect appreciation of the local commission report as well as NADRA reports and the law applicable in this regard.

He pleaded the court to set aside the verdict and dismiss Imran Khan's election petition with costs.

Punjab election commission's tribunal had ordered re-polling in NA-122, declaring the election in the constituency null and void – accepting PTI Chairman Imran Khan's petition challenging the 2013 election result.

National Assembly Speaker Ayaz Sadiq had defeated Imran Khan in the 2013 general elections from NA-122 after which PTI had challenged the results.

NA-122 was among the four controversial constituencies — the other three being NA-110 (Sialkot), NA-125 (Lahore) and NA-154 (Lodhran) — where PTI had demanded for voters’ thumbprint verification in the hopes of finding a solution that might be acceptable to all concerned.

It is to be mentioned here that proceedings of Imran Khan’s petition remained suspended for a year. The Lahore High Court on Nov 4, 2013, had granted a stay to the NA speaker against the proceedings before the tribunal. The court on Nov 20, 2014, recalled the stay order and allowed the tribunal to proceed with the case.

Opinion

From hard to harder

From hard to harder

Instead of ‘hard state’ turning even harder, citizens deserve a state that goes soft on them in delivering democratic and development aspirations.

Editorial

Canal unrest
Updated 03 Apr, 2025

Canal unrest

With rising water scarcity in Indus system, it is crucial to move towards a consensus-driven policymaking process.
Iran-US tension
03 Apr, 2025

Iran-US tension

THE Trump administration’s threats aimed at Iran do not bode well for global peace, and unless Washington changes...
Flights to history
03 Apr, 2025

Flights to history

MOHENJODARO could have been the forgotten gold we desperately need. Instead, this 5,000-year-old well of antiquity ...
Eid amidst crises
Updated 31 Mar, 2025

Eid amidst crises

Until the Muslim world takes practical steps to end these atrocities, these besieged populations will see no joy.
Women’s rights
Updated 01 Apr, 2025

Women’s rights

Such judgements, and others directly impacting women’s rights should be given more airtime in media.
Not helping
Updated 02 Apr, 2025

Not helping

If it's committed to peace in Balochistan, the state must draw a line between militancy and legitimate protest.