Indian court finds 12 guilty of 2006 Mumbai train bombings

Published September 11, 2015
In this photograph taken on July 11, 2006, Indian rescue workers search for bodies inside the mangled compartment of a blast affected local train at Mahim railway station in Mumbai. — AFP
In this photograph taken on July 11, 2006, Indian rescue workers search for bodies inside the mangled compartment of a blast affected local train at Mahim railway station in Mumbai. — AFP
In this photograph taken on July 12, 2006, Indian commuters walk past the blast site at Mahim railway station in Mumbai, the day after a wave of coordinated blasts on commuter trains in India's financial capital. — AFP
In this photograph taken on July 12, 2006, Indian commuters walk past the blast site at Mahim railway station in Mumbai, the day after a wave of coordinated blasts on commuter trains in India's financial capital. — AFP

NEW DELHI: An Indian court on Friday convicted 12 of planning blasts that ripped through Mumbai commuter trains in 2006, killing more than 180 people and wounding hundreds.

The 12 men who were convicted have been idetified as Kamal Ansari, Asif Khan, Mohammed Faisal Ataur Rahman Shaikh, Ehtesham Kutubuddin Siddiqui, Naveed Hussain Khan, Tanvir Ansari, Mohammed Majid Shafi, Shaikh Mohammed Ali Alam Shaikh, Mohammeed Ansari, Muzammil Sheikh, Soheil Shaikh and Zameer Shaikh, according to a report published on the Hindustan Times website.

Judge Yatin D. Shinde on Friday found them guilty of murder and criminal conspiracy charges and said he will announce their sentences on Monday after hearing arguments from the prosecutors and defence attorneys. They face the death penalty.

"I want the strictest possible punishment for them,” prosecution lawyer Raja Thakare told AFP by phone. “Whatever sentence the judge hands out, it should be able to satisfy the public at large.“

In all, police charged 30 people over the bombings, including 13 Pakistani nationals, who along with four Indian suspects have yet to be arrested.

One of the accused, identified as Abdul Wahid Shaikh, was acquitted of all charges. The accused were represented by Shahid Azmi, a Muslim rights activist and lawyer, who was killed mysteriously killed by unidentified gunmen in 2010.

Seven bombs went off within 15 minutes on the packed trains during the evening rush hour in Mumbai on July 11, 2006. Over the course of the nine-year trial, the court examined nearly 250 witnesses.

Police accused Pakistan-based militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) of carrying out the 2006 attacks, although a little known outfit called the Lashkar-e-Qahhar claimed responsibility.

The bombs were placed in bags that were hidden under newspapers and umbrellas in the trains.

Prosecutors said the bombs were assembled in Mumbai and deliberately placed in first-class coaches to target the city's wealthy Gujarati community.

They said the bombings were intended as revenge for the riots in the western state of Gujarat in 2002, which left some 2,000 people dead, most of them Muslims.

The attacks prompted India to freeze peace talks with Pakistan for several months.

Opinion

Editorial

Kurram atrocity
Updated 22 Nov, 2024

Kurram atrocity

It would be a monumental mistake for the state to continue ignoring the violence in Kurram.
Persistent grip
22 Nov, 2024

Persistent grip

An audit of polio funds at federal and provincial levels is sorely needed, with obstacles hindering eradication efforts targeted.
Green transport
22 Nov, 2024

Green transport

THE government has taken a commendable step by announcing a New Energy Vehicle policy aiming to ensure that by 2030,...
Military option
Updated 21 Nov, 2024

Military option

While restoring peace is essential, addressing Balochistan’s socioeconomic deprivation is equally important.
HIV/AIDS disaster
21 Nov, 2024

HIV/AIDS disaster

A TORTUROUS sense of déjà vu is attached to the latest health fiasco at Multan’s Nishtar Hospital. The largest...
Dubious pardon
21 Nov, 2024

Dubious pardon

IT is disturbing how a crime as grave as custodial death has culminated in an out-of-court ‘settlement’. The...