Most drone strikes hit unintended targets, says report

Published October 17, 2015
Nearly 85 per cent of people killed by US drones in recent strikes are unintended targets.—AP/File
Nearly 85 per cent of people killed by US drones in recent strikes are unintended targets.—AP/File

WASHINGTON: Nearly 85 per cent of people killed by US drones in recent strikes were unintended targets, says a report released on Friday.

The report by an online news site The Intercept also says that US drone strikes have killed scores of civilians in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia since 2009.

The Intercept was established in February 2014 by the founders of the multi-billion dollars online auction site, e-Bay founders, to “produce fearless, adversarial journalism across a wide range of issues”.

The news site reports that the US campaign, known as “Operation Haymaker” was meant to target Al Qaeda and Taliban leads and has so far killed more than 200 people. But only 35 of these were enemy targets.

It’s unclear how long this mission lasted, but by the end of 2013, the number of civilian casualties by drones in Afghanistan tripled from the prior year.

The report points out that drone attacks, laser-guided bombs and “nonlethal weapons”, which were supposed to reduce civilian casualties and suffering, have failed to achieve the goal.

The report, compiled from classified documents released by a source in the intelligence community, corroborates the many news accounts of civilian deaths in drone strikes.

The report notes that while US government officials claim the drone strikes rarely harm innocent civilians, strikes can kill or injure anyone in the area, even while focusing on a targeted individual.

“Anyone caught in the vicinity is guilty by association,” the source of the documents told The Intercept. When “a drone strike kills more than one person, there is no guarantee that those persons deserved their fate. … So it’s a phenomenal gamble.”

In one five-month period of the operation, nearly 90 per cent of those killed in airstrikes were not the intended targets, The Intercept reports.

The report acknowledges that US has better intelligence in Afghanistan than in places like Yemen and Somalia, where the ratios of civilian deaths may be even worse.

US government statements minimising the number of civilian casualties from drone strikes were “exaggerating at best, if not outright lies”, said the source, which provided classified documents to the news site.

Asked about the report, White House spokesman Josh Earnest said President Barack Obama “has obviously made a policy decision to try to be as transparent as possible about our counter-terrorism operations all around the world”. Those operations “go to great lengths to limit civilian casualties,” he added.

Published in Dawn, October 17th , 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Smog hazard
Updated 05 Nov, 2024

Smog hazard

The catastrophe unfolding in Lahore is a product of authorities’ repeated failure to recognise environmental impact of rapid urbanisation.
Monetary policy
05 Nov, 2024

Monetary policy

IN an aggressive move, the State Bank on Monday reduced its key policy rate by a hefty 250bps to 15pc. This is the...
Cultural power
05 Nov, 2024

Cultural power

AS vital modes of communication, art and culture have the power to overcome social and international barriers....
Disregarding CCI
Updated 04 Nov, 2024

Disregarding CCI

The failure to regularly convene CCI meetings means that the process of democratic decision-making is falling apart.
Defeating TB
04 Nov, 2024

Defeating TB

CONSIDERING the fact that Pakistan has the fifth highest burden of tuberculosis in the world as per the World Health...
Ceasefire charade
Updated 04 Nov, 2024

Ceasefire charade

The US talks of peace, while simultaneously arming and funding their Israeli allies, are doomed to fail, and are little more than a charade.