ISLAMABAD: The witnesses in Lahore's Zain murder case retracted their statements after receiving money from the accused, Additional Advocate General (AAG) Punjab Razzaq A Mirza told the Supreme Court on Tuesday.

A three-member bench headed by Justice Amir Hani Muslim commenced suo motu hearing about the acquittal of the accused in the murder case today.

AAG Mirza informed the court that the provincial government would file a petition against the acquittal of the five accused.

During the hearing, Justice Manzoor Ahmed Malik asked the prosecutor why the witnesses had retracted their statements in the case.

The Punjab prosecutor replied that many of the witnesses are property dealers who withdrew their statements after receiving money from the accused.

Also read: Zain murder case: Another witness refuses to identify Kanju

Justice Sardar Tariq Masood asked if evidence against the accused existed which could lead to their sentence. He also asked why the statements of the witnesses were not recorded under Article 164.

The prosecutor replied that evidence is present under which the accused could be sentenced.

The court summoned relatives and prosecution witnesses in the next hearing and directed Inspector General Punjab to present the relatives and witnesses under security. The hearing was subsequently adjourned to Nov 16.

Chief Justice of Pakistan Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali had in October taken suo motu notice of acquittal of Mustafa Kanju, son of former minister of state Siddique Kanju, by a Lahore Anti-Terrorism Court in Zain murder case.

The Supreme Court had summoned record of the case from the trial court on Oct 30. The record was provided to the apex court.

But they were acquitted of all charges by ATC-I Presiding Judge Muhammad Qasim on Oct 28 because of lack of evidence, although the trial court had indicted them for killing 16-year-old Zain and injuring Husain, 18.

Know more: Zain murder case: Kanju, his guards acquitted

As per the prosecution, Kanju was allegedly drunk when his luxury car hit another car driven by a woman, who was never identified by the investigators. It said Kanju got infuriated and opened fire at his opponent party. However, the woman had already driven away from the scene and Zain and Husain, the passers-by, were hit by the firing.

Zain succumbed to his injuries at a local hospital. Kanju had escaped from the scene and later was arrested from Khushab.

Gulberg police had lodged FIR against Kanju and his guards under section 7-ATA and section 302 of PPC. In this case, the prosecution had also filed a petition before the Lahore High Court with a request to transfer the trial to some other judge expressing distrust of the incumbent.

The ATC later released the accused after they submitted an application under Section 265-K of the Criminal Procedure Code as the complainant and all prosecution witnesses had not testified against them.

Also read: A case for strong witness protection laws in Pakistan

Opinion

Editorial

Desperate measures
Updated 27 Dec, 2024

Desperate measures

Sadly in Pakistan, street protests and sit-ins have become the only resort to catch the attention of a callous power elite.
Economic outlook
27 Dec, 2024

Economic outlook

THE post-pandemic years, marked by extreme volatility in the global oil and commodity markets as well as slowing...
Cricket and visas
27 Dec, 2024

Cricket and visas

PAKISTAN has asserted that delay in the announcement of the schedule of next year’s Champions Trophy will not...
Afghan strikes
Updated 26 Dec, 2024

Afghan strikes

The military option has been employed by the govt apparently to signal its unhappiness over the state of affairs with Afghanistan.
Revamping tax policy
26 Dec, 2024

Revamping tax policy

THE tax bureaucracy appears to have convinced the government that it can boost revenues simply by taking harsher...
Betraying women voters
26 Dec, 2024

Betraying women voters

THE ECP’s recent pledge to eliminate the gender gap among voters falls flat in the face of troubling revelations...