WASHINGTON: The US State Department has said it is looking forward to a “meaningful dialogue” with Pakistan at a nuclear summit next week.

As world leaders, including those from India and Pakistan, gather in Washington this week to discuss nuclear security issues, the prestigious Harvard Kennedy School released a report reviewing global security measures.

The report concluded that Pakistan’s nuclear security arrangements were stronger than India’s, although the country still faced significant threats from terrorist groups.

At the State Department, spokesman John Kirby told a news briefing that the United States “routinely discusses” issues of nuclear security with Pakistan.

“We look forward to having Pakistan represented at the Nuclear Security Summit coming up and to being able to continue to have meaningful dialogue about issues of nuclear security,” he added.

The two-day, fourth Nuclear Security Summit begins in Washington on March 31 and prime ministers of both India and Pakistan have pledged to attend it.

Their presence in the US capital, and subsequent comments by both Pakistani and Indian officials, have also raised hopes for a bilateral meeting between the two South Asian leaders.

While US officials have not confirmed or denied reports that they are encouraging the two prime ministers to meet, Mr Kirby said that the US had always welcomed moves aimed at reducing tensions between India and Pakistan.

“We welcome efforts that have been taken and efforts that may be taken in the future to work out those issues bilaterally between the two countries,” he said.

Last week, US Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security Rose Gottemoeller also told a congressional panel that Pakistan had “really done an excellent job” of establishing a programme for nuclear security. This programme was “not only serving Pakistan’s interests, but is also serving on a regional basis to provide training with the help of the IAEA,” she said.

Ms Gottemoeller noted that India was still “at an early stage” of establishing its own Centre of Excellence for nuclear security”.

Meanwhile, a report examining nuclear security worldwide suggests India’s “nuclear security measures may be weaker than those of Pakistan”, but says the risk “appears to be moderate”, while claiming risk of nuclear theft in Pakistan “appears to be high”.

“US officials have reportedly ranked Indian nuclear security measures as weaker than those of Pakistan and Russia,” the Harvard Kennedy School reported.

“US experts visiting the sensitive Bhabha Atomic Research Centre in 2008 described the security arrangements there as extraordinarily low key,” the report added.

In a review of global measures for nuclear security, the report noted that while India’s security arrangements were weaker than Pakistan’s, adversary threats in India were also “less extreme” than those in Pakistan.

“Overall, the risk of nuclear theft in Pakistan appears to be high,” said the report, adding that the possibility of a government or an “extremist takeover in Pakistan cannot be entirely ruled out”.

Nuclear risks in Pakistan, the report noted, was also linked to an expansion in the country’s nuclear arsenal. A shift in Pakistan’s strategic doctrine towards tactical nuclear weapons also increased the risk, the report added.

Despite these risks, “Pakistan has substantially strengthened its nuclear security in the past two decades,” the report said. It also highlighted the measures Pakistan had taken to enhance security: Deployment of 25,000 troops to guard nuclear stocks and facilities; equipping sites with extensive barriers and detection systems, separating storage of nuclear weapons components, providing weapons with locks to prevent unauthorised use and extensive cooperation with the United States to improve nuclear security.

But Pakistan “must protect against almost overwhelming adversary threats” which include terrorist groups that have demonstrated “that they are willing and able to launch complex, well-coordinated attacks on heavily defended military targets within Pakistan”, the report warned.

It referred to the 2014 attempted hijacking of a naval frigate by Al Qaeda’s South Asian affiliate to highlight the threat, noting that the terrorists had planned to use “its anti-ship missiles to attack US naval vessels”.

Published in Dawn, March 24th, 2016

Opinion

Editorial

Military option
Updated 21 Nov, 2024

Military option

While restoring peace is essential, addressing Balochistan’s socioeconomic deprivation is equally important.
HIV/AIDS disaster
21 Nov, 2024

HIV/AIDS disaster

A TORTUROUS sense of déjà vu is attached to the latest health fiasco at Multan’s Nishtar Hospital. The largest...
Dubious pardon
21 Nov, 2024

Dubious pardon

IT is disturbing how a crime as grave as custodial death has culminated in an out-of-court ‘settlement’. The...
Islamabad protest
Updated 20 Nov, 2024

Islamabad protest

As Nov 24 draws nearer, both the PTI and the Islamabad administration must remain wary and keep within the limits of reason and the law.
PIA uncertainty
20 Nov, 2024

PIA uncertainty

THE failed attempt to privatise the national flag carrier late last month has led to a fierce debate around the...
T20 disappointment
20 Nov, 2024

T20 disappointment

AFTER experiencing the historic high of the One-day International series triumph against Australia, Pakistan came...