MORE and more shops are being built in the Malir City Compound, undermining the structure of the old building.—Photo by writer
MORE and more shops are being built in the Malir City Compound, undermining the structure of the old building.—Photo by writer

KARACHI: The façade of a 100-year-old temple located in the city is going to be completely hidden from the public eye because of illegal construction to which the authorities are paying no attention, it emerged on Tuesday.

A recent protest by the Karachi Indigenous Rights Alliance brought the issue of the temple and a surrounding compound located a few kilometres ahead of Malir 15 to the limelight.

Known as the Malir City Compound, the conflict surrounding the structure centres on the ongoing construction of three shops outside the compound’s outer wall.

The construction on what is known as the Malir Mandir stop was obstructing the view of the compound.

Fareed Ahmed, a resident living inside the area for the past 45 years, said those constructing the shops are from Quetta. “They are not trying to build anything inside the compound, but outside it. However, this construction would weaken the supporting wall at the entrance which might fall if not taken care of,” added Ahmed.

Written in English on a small plaque on the right side of the main entrance is the history of the compound itself. The plaque states that it was built as a sanatorium on Dec 10, 1914, by “Dedhar Pragji, in the memory of Tekar Lakshmidass and Shivaji Kanji Pragji Somaya”. The same is stated on the left of the entrance in Hindi. A temple inside the sanatorium was built before that, added historian and writer Gul Hassan Kalmati, which was a Shiv Mandir.

Also associated with the Indigenous Alliance protesting the recent construction of the shops, Kalmati said: “Hindus never lived inside the sanatorium; they only visited the temple during religious ceremonies. Later, after the partition, a group of migrants were provided shelter in the sanatorium with the promise of being provided an alternative compound. But since that never happened, they ended up living here.”

Testifying to that, Ahmed said that his family moved in 40 years ago when he was just five. “We had nowhere to go at the time as our family had sold everything in India in order to move to Pakistan. We have a mosque and a temple inside the compound,” he added.

But the temple is sealed. This happened after the demolition of Babri Masjid in Ayodhya in 1992.

One of the residents, Mohammad Zohaib, says: “A group of men barged into the compound and attacked the mandir the day the mosque was attacked in India. Since then, the mandir is sealed and locked by the Auqaf department (which takes care of the shrines and mosques).”

Standing in the centre of the criss-crossing lanes of the compound, the temple is only visible through its elegant upper structure. The lower part is covered from all four sides by the surrounding two-room houses.

Kalmati believed that incidents like Ayodhya “provide best opportunities to the land grabbers in the city. For them, it is an opportunity to take over a heritage site and build something else in its place”.

Mohammad Zubair, one of the shopkeepers, said that he paid Rs400 rent for the shop, which will soon be a milk shop, on land he said was owned by the Auqaf department. “My father, Mohammad Nawaz, owns the place and we are building this shop legally,” is all that Zubair said when asked about the ownership of the shop. The residents say that the construction began in November and that, so far, no one from the Auqaf department came to stop the construction.

However, Kalmati questioned the claims of the residents and of those constructing the shops and said that the Auqaf department was probably not the right authority to speak on the issue. “The land might be under the ownership of the culture department or the Evacuee Trust Property Board (ETPB). We are in the process of approaching them and as soon as we get a response from them we’d know exactly how to stop the construction,” he added.

Published in Dawn, January 4th, 2017

Opinion

Editorial

Online oppression
Updated 04 Dec, 2024

Online oppression

Plan to bring changes to Peca is simply another attempt to suffocate dissent. It shows how the state continues to prioritise control over real cybersecurity concerns.
The right call
04 Dec, 2024

The right call

AMIDST the ongoing tussle between the federal government and the main opposition party, several critical issues...
Acting cautiously
04 Dec, 2024

Acting cautiously

IT appears too big a temptation to ignore. The wider expectations for a steeper reduction in the borrowing costs...
Competing narratives
03 Dec, 2024

Competing narratives

Rather than hunting keyboard warriors, it would be better to support a transparent probe into reported deaths during PTI protest.
Early retirement
03 Dec, 2024

Early retirement

THE government is reportedly considering a proposal to reduce the average age of superannuation by five years to 55...
Being differently abled
03 Dec, 2024

Being differently abled

A SOCIETY comes of age when it does not normalise ‘othering’. As we observe the International Day of Persons ...