WASHINGTON: The United States is quietly urging Pakistan and Afg­hanistan to avoid a confrontational approach and find a minimum common ground for combating terrorism.

Diplomatic sources told Dawn that in conversations with Pakistani and Afghan officials, both in Washington and in Islamabad and Kabul, American officials have asked them also to devise a mechanism for resolving their disputes.

The US government was willing to help both governments in finding a common grou­nd for joint actions aga­i­n­­st the terrorists operating from both sides of the border, the sources said.

Gen John Nicholson, the top US commander in Afghanistan, also indicated this when he told the US Senate’s Armed Services Committee this month that the United States was seeking to set up an “enduring counterterrorism platform” in Afghanistan.

He said there could be no peace in Afghanistan without Pakistan’s support and he would urge Pakistani officials to work with the Afghans for defeating terrorism.

In recent discussions at Washington think-tanks, some American experts on Afghanistan argued that the Trump administration was better placed to play an effective role in bringing peace to the Pak-Afghan region because unlike the Obama administration, it did not have any baggage.

The Obama administration inherited the war from the Bush administration and spent its initial years in trying to win it, which made it difficult for it to negotiate with the Taliban.

Washington’s new rulers also played no role in cobbling together the present political setup in Kabul, which brought together two unnatural allies, President Ashraf Ghani and Chief Executive Abdullah Abdullah.

“This gives the new administration more room to operate and to reach out to both the Taliban as well as the government in Kabul,” said one expert.

At one discussion, a former State Depart­ment official with a vast experience in that region also stressed the need for negotiating with the Afghan Taliban. The official argued that “demonising the Taliban was a mistake as it reduced the room for a dialogue”.

The official pointed out that now that the US administration wanted to engage with the Taliban, “there’s a resistance, particularly here in the United States where people do not understand why their government is talking to the demons”.

Recently, James Dobbins, a former US special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, told the Voice of America radio that the United States was always aware of the need to engage the Afghan Taliban and that’s why it placed the Pakistani Taliban (TTP) on its terrorist list but did not designate the Afghan Taliban.

In the case of the Afghan Taliban, “the deterring factor has long been a concern that applying the terror label to the group would restrict US and Afghan government diplom­atic contacts with the Taliban, making peace talks more difficult”, the VOA observed.

“There is no doubt that the Taliban occasionally attack civilians intentionally, not accidentally, and that’s the definition of terrorism,” Mr Dobbins said. “And, thus, the designation would be accurate enough. The question is whether it would serve the US and Afghan government purposes for that step to be taken?”

Mr Dobbins said that the government in Kabul might not support the move to label the Taliban because they “hope eventually to be able to launch some process of reconciliation”. The Trump administration would go ahead with the designation only if it “wants to create an obstacle to communication with the Taliban”.

A spokesman for Afghan President Ghani told the VOA he was unaware of any proposal to designate the Taliban as a terrorist organisation.

Meanwhile, a spokesperson for the US State Department strongly supported Pakis­tan’s efforts to eliminate terrorist hideouts.

“We believe that US long-term interests are best served by supporting Pakistan’s effo­rts to combat violent extremism and build a more stable, tolerant, democratic society,” said the official when asked for comments on Pakistan’s latest anti-terror operation.

“Pakistan has suffered greatly at the hands of terrorists and violent extremists. The United States has long stood in solidarity with the people of Pakistan and all who fight the menace of terrorism,” the official added.

Reports in the Pakistani media suggested that Pakistani troops also shelled some terrorist hideouts along the Afghan border. The action, aimed at targets close to Mohmand and Khyber tribal agencies, caused an angry reaction from the Afghan government.

“We are grateful for the sacrifices the Pakistani military and people have made in combating terrorism, shutting down terrorist safe havens and restoring government control to parts of Pakistan that have been used as terrorist safe havens for years,” the State Department official said.

Published in Dawn, February 24th, 2017

Opinion

Who bears the cost?

Who bears the cost?

This small window of low inflation should compel a rethink of how the authorities and employers understand the average household’s

Editorial

Internet restrictions
Updated 23 Dec, 2024

Internet restrictions

Notion that Pakistan enjoys unprecedented freedom of expression difficult to reconcile with the reality of restrictions.
Bangladesh reset
23 Dec, 2024

Bangladesh reset

THE vibes were positive during Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s recent meeting with Bangladesh interim leader Dr...
Leaving home
23 Dec, 2024

Leaving home

FROM asylum seekers to economic migrants, the continuing exodus from Pakistan shows mass disillusionment with the...
Military convictions
Updated 22 Dec, 2024

Military convictions

Pakistan’s democracy, still finding its feet, cannot afford such compromises on core democratic values.
Need for talks
22 Dec, 2024

Need for talks

FOR a long time now, the country has been in the grip of relentless political uncertainty, featuring the...
Vulnerable vaccinators
22 Dec, 2024

Vulnerable vaccinators

THE campaign to eradicate polio from Pakistan cannot succeed unless the safety of vaccinators and security personnel...