ISLAMABAD: The Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) has challenged the ban imposed by the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) on party heads and lawmakers to run campaigns for by-elections.

PTI chairman Imran Khan on Tuesday filed a petition with the Islamabad High Court (IHC) against the notifications issued by the ECP restraining party heads, lawmakers and government functionaries from visiting any constituency or giving subscriptions or donations in any constituency.

The petition named the chairman and the director general (elections) of the ECP as respondents.

The petition said being head of a political party Imran Khan addressed public gatherings in connection with by-elections throughout the country and it was his right guaranteed under Article 16 of the Constitution (peaceful assembly).

“That under the Constitution, no restriction could be imposed on any person accept under the law and if restrictions were imposed those were just to maintain public order.”


PTI petitions IHC to declare notifications issued by Election Commission of Pakistan illegal


The PTI chairman said he and his party had a commendable record of holding peaceful rallies and sit-ins for an unprecedented period of marathon 126 days, which proved the fact that they believed in the supremacy of the law, Constitution and public order.

The ECP on April 16, 2015, issued notifications to restrict the president, prime minister, chief ministers, state ministers, governors and advisers from visiting any area of any constituency or giving any subscription or donation is such constituencies. Later, MNAs and MPAs were also included in the notification. These notifications were challenged before a high court that declared them null and void. However, the ECP filed appeals in the Supreme Court of Pakistan.

The apex court in September 2015 passed an interim order through which the operation of the high court judgment was suspended, and the notification was revived.

The ECP on Feb 6, 2017, issued notices to Mr Khan for visiting different constituencies in Punjab. According to the petitioner, these notices were illegal, mala fide and without a lawful authority.

Babar Awan, the counsel for Imran Khan, contended in the petition that the PTI chairman was an aggrieved party because being head of a political party he could not even visit constituencies during the campaign for by-elections.

“That for all practical purposes and intent, it is the opposition which is put at disadvantage and these notifications are for the advantage of treasury benches,” the petition claimed.

The petitioner requested the court to declare the notifications and proceedings pending against him before the ECP as illegal.

Published in Dawn, May 3rd, 2017

Opinion

Editorial

Short-changed?
Updated 24 Nov, 2024

Short-changed?

As nations continue to argue, the international community must recognise that climate finance is not merely about numbers.
Overblown ‘threat’
24 Nov, 2024

Overblown ‘threat’

ON the eve of the PTI’s ‘do or die’ protest in the federal capital, there seemed to be little evidence of the...
Exclusive politics
24 Nov, 2024

Exclusive politics

THERE has been a gradual erasure of the voices of most marginalised groups from Pakistan’s mainstream political...
Counterterrorism plan
Updated 23 Nov, 2024

Counterterrorism plan

Lacunae in our counterterrorism efforts need to be plugged quickly.
Bullish stock market
23 Nov, 2024

Bullish stock market

NORMALLY, stock markets rise gradually. In recent months, however, Pakistan’s stock market has soared to one ...
Political misstep
Updated 23 Nov, 2024

Political misstep

To drag a critical ally like Saudi Arabia into unfounded conspiracies is detrimental to Pakistan’s foreign policy.