Finance minister Ishaq Dar, in a review petition filed in the Supreme Court (SC) on Monday, challenged the court's verdict on the Panama Papers case, claiming that a reference against him cannot be filed based on a "spurious JIT (joint investigation team) report".

Dar has filed the petition just one day before the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) summoned him to appear before investigators for a probe into his assets and funds.

According to the petition filed, the ruling passed by the SC on April 20 did not give the JIT any grounds to investigate the petitioner's (Dar) assets. He claims that the investigation team "self-evidently exceeded its mandate by opining on whether or not the petitioner's assets were disproportionate to his known income".

In the petition, Dar admits that his assets did increase between the years 2008-09, however he insisted that the rise was due to six years of foreign income. He also states that the record of the income was presented to the JIT.

Dar insists that while his assets did increase from Rs9mn to Rs831mn during 1993 to 2009, "it is a moot point whether a period of 16 years can be considered a short period of time" to assess the growth in his wealth. He adds that the court had failed to take into account that the worth of the petitioner's assets had reduced by Rs544mn in the next seven years, including the time when he was finance minister.

In the petition, Dar also pointed out that he had submitted the records of his wealth and income statements from 1983-2016 which were accepted by tax authorities.

Raising objections over the damning SC ruling on the Panama Papers case, he asked how five judges could pass a verdict on the case when only three oversaw the JIT's proceedings.

He also claimed that it would be a violation of his basic rights if references against him were filed without taking his reservations into account.

Dar also raised objections over the appointment of a monitoring judge to oversee the proceedings of references filed in the National Accountability Bureau, saying that it makes the SC an unofficial petitioner and will affect the proceedings of the case.

He claimed that both, the July 28 verdict and the appointment of a monitoring judge, are a violation of Articles 175 and 203.

The SC had ordered NAB to open references against Dar and former premier Nawaz Sharif's family in its verdict on Panama Papers case.

On August 15, Sharif too had filed three separate petitions in the SC to review and stay further implementation of the Panamagate verdict.

Opinion

Who bears the cost?

Who bears the cost?

This small window of low inflation should compel a rethink of how the authorities and employers understand the average household’s

Editorial

Internet restrictions
23 Dec, 2024

Internet restrictions

JUST how much longer does the government plan on throttling the internet is a question up in the air right now....
Bangladesh reset
23 Dec, 2024

Bangladesh reset

THE vibes were positive during Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s recent meeting with Bangladesh interim leader Dr...
Leaving home
23 Dec, 2024

Leaving home

FROM asylum seekers to economic migrants, the continuing exodus from Pakistan shows mass disillusionment with the...
Military convictions
Updated 22 Dec, 2024

Military convictions

Pakistan’s democracy, still finding its feet, cannot afford such compromises on core democratic values.
Need for talks
22 Dec, 2024

Need for talks

FOR a long time now, the country has been in the grip of relentless political uncertainty, featuring the...
Vulnerable vaccinators
22 Dec, 2024

Vulnerable vaccinators

THE campaign to eradicate polio from Pakistan cannot succeed unless the safety of vaccinators and security personnel...