Kian D. Delos Santos
Kian D. Delos Santos

The killing of 17-year-old Kian D. Delos Santos has stirred us out of our intimidation-induced stupor and shaken an administration built on fear. From the circumstances of his life (a boy with the simple dream of becoming a policeman) to the circumstances of his death (a cynical, cruel dance of death choreographed by policemen), from the courage of the witnesses (who have taken considerable risks to speak in detail) to the character of his parents (who have spoken boldly and with utmost candour), Kian has struck fear among the very people for whom fear is a strategy.

How do we know this? Because even some of the administration’s stalwart allies have publicly condemned the killing. Because the trolls as well as the blogger-defenders of the administration, after a lull that recalled their studied silence when President Duterte went missing in June, have returned with prepared scripts and attacking themes. Because the police has belatedly sought to paint Kian as a runner in the illegal drugs trade. (The former solicitor general, Florin Hilbay, has a term for what the police are doing: the “After Murder Identification of Suspects.”)

Kian is not the first innocent to die in the human rights catastrophe that is the president’s so-called war on drugs; tragically, he won’t be the last. But his killing disturbed the consciences of many Filipinos (even, as anyone with a social media account knows by now, remorseful Duterte voters) because the circumstances that led to his death were caught on camera.

To my knowledge, none of the senators who voted in favour of a committee report dismissing the existence of extrajudicial killings ever went out at night (when most of the extrajudicial killings happen) to look at the dead bodies that continue to pile up day after violent day. That made it possible to compartmentalise the problem. But the CCTV clip, which shows Kian being led away by non-uniformed men moments before he was shot dead, cannot be wished away.

Recovering from their shock, Duterte supporters are now demonising a mere boy, or inventing stories using their creative imagination, or pre-emptively defending the president from any liability or responsibility — because they suspect the controversy over Kian’s killing can be a tipping point in the supposed ouster plot against the president. As I have written before, I do not believe there is any such plot. But as I have also argued before, the need exists for a countervailing power to check the Duterte administration’s excesses.

Some who have seen the kill list grow have given up on a spineless senate, or a supreme court with a plurality of practical-minded justices, or a professional but distracted military, or a Catholic church without enough courageous pastors worthy of their calling. Kian’s killing has the potential to change all that. That is why the Duterte administration is, as kids say these days, “shookt”.

Its officials know that the battle cry against the dictator Ferdinand Marcos was a series of escalating demands: “Tama na, sobra na, palitan na.” (Enough is enough. This is too much. Replace him.)

I do not think that the momentum of outrage over Kian’s killing — and by extension the thousands of EJKs perpetrated since last year — is enough to bring the country to the third stage. And it isn’t necessary. This administration reads and responds to the surveys, is in fact highly sensitive to public opinion. If public opinion will be galvanised by Kian’s killing, it can create the conditions for countervailing powers to emerge again.

Many of the people I follow on social media are skeptical, to say the least, about the senate majority; they see the resolution to investigate Kian’s killing as a desperate public relations initiative, to distance the senators from the public outrage.

I hold a different view. Without diminishing the majority’s role as enabler or deodorant of state violence, we can hope that Kian’s killing has moved enough of them — or two or three more justices, or the professionals in the military, or more leaders of the Church — to say, Enough. Tama na.

Philippine Daily Inquirer

Published in Dawn, August 23rd, 2017

Opinion

Who bears the cost?

Who bears the cost?

This small window of low inflation should compel a rethink of how the authorities and employers understand the average household’s

Editorial

Internet restrictions
23 Dec, 2024

Internet restrictions

JUST how much longer does the government plan on throttling the internet is a question up in the air right now....
Bangladesh reset
23 Dec, 2024

Bangladesh reset

THE vibes were positive during Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s recent meeting with Bangladesh interim leader Dr...
Leaving home
23 Dec, 2024

Leaving home

FROM asylum seekers to economic migrants, the continuing exodus from Pakistan shows mass disillusionment with the...
Military convictions
Updated 22 Dec, 2024

Military convictions

Pakistan’s democracy, still finding its feet, cannot afford such compromises on core democratic values.
Need for talks
22 Dec, 2024

Need for talks

FOR a long time now, the country has been in the grip of relentless political uncertainty, featuring the...
Vulnerable vaccinators
22 Dec, 2024

Vulnerable vaccinators

THE campaign to eradicate polio from Pakistan cannot succeed unless the safety of vaccinators and security personnel...