North Korea crisis

Published September 7, 2017

EVEN the remote prospect of nuclear war is a chilling thought. However, the dangerous escalation between North Korea and the United States — both nuclear-armed states — shows no sign of abating. The root of the conflict lies in the Korean War that ended in 1953, which left the Korean peninsula divided between the communist North and capitalist South. Today, over two decades since the end of the Cold War, the seeds of conflict remain in this troubled peninsula. The latest crisis has been triggered by a series of provocative actions by Pyongyang. Last month, the North threatened to fire missiles at the US Pacific territory of Guam; this was followed by an even more troubling move in late August when Pyongyang fired a ballistic missile over the Japanese island of Hokkaido. On Sunday, the North claimed to have tested a hydrogen bomb. While all these moves by the isolationist regime are indeed troubling, the response of the US — Pyongyang’s primary foe — has hardly been measured. For example, the US president has threatened the North with “fire and fury” should it attack America.

Aside from the fact that the relationship between Pyongyang and Washington has been characterised by decades of mutual hostility, at this time both states are headed by men who regularly indulge in provocative bluster. For example, Kim Jong-un, North Korea’s current strongman, termed his country’s intercontinental ballistic missiles a “gift for the American [expletive]” on America’s independence day. Mr Trump, hardly known for his subtle language, has said that “talking” to the North is not the answer, and that “they only understand one thing” alluding to the use of force. One tends to differ with Mr Trump; talking is indeed the answer to this crisis, as the alternative is far more horrific. Even South Korea, a staunch American ally and the state that arguably has most to lose in case of war, has differed with Washington’s approach and called for “peaceful denuclearisation of the Korean Peninsula”. All stakeholders, especially the North and the US, must first stop issuing threats against each other. Second, saner minds on all sides must resist the march towards war. China and Russia have influence over the North, which they should use to urge Pyongyang to climb down. On the other side, cooler minds within the US establishment need to prevent their country from getting involved in another disastrous conflict.

Published in Dawn, September 7th, 2017

Opinion

Who bears the cost?

Who bears the cost?

This small window of low inflation should compel a rethink of how the authorities and employers understand the average household’s

Editorial

Internet restrictions
Updated 23 Dec, 2024

Internet restrictions

Notion that Pakistan enjoys unprecedented freedom of expression difficult to reconcile with the reality of restrictions.
Bangladesh reset
23 Dec, 2024

Bangladesh reset

THE vibes were positive during Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s recent meeting with Bangladesh interim leader Dr...
Leaving home
23 Dec, 2024

Leaving home

FROM asylum seekers to economic migrants, the continuing exodus from Pakistan shows mass disillusionment with the...
Military convictions
Updated 22 Dec, 2024

Military convictions

Pakistan’s democracy, still finding its feet, cannot afford such compromises on core democratic values.
Need for talks
22 Dec, 2024

Need for talks

FOR a long time now, the country has been in the grip of relentless political uncertainty, featuring the...
Vulnerable vaccinators
22 Dec, 2024

Vulnerable vaccinators

THE campaign to eradicate polio from Pakistan cannot succeed unless the safety of vaccinators and security personnel...