Publications law

Published September 16, 2017

THE framing of laws and the ambit of their application is always a delicate balancing act. After the media managed to see off the threat posed by a draft law targeting the press, another, albeit somewhat less worrisome, challenge has come up. It appears that the draft Sindh Press, Newspapers, News Agencies and Books Act, 2017, has been approved by the chief minister and will now be scrutinised by the law ministry and then sent to the provincial cabinet for further perusal. The subject had been devolved to the provinces when the Concurrent List was abolished after the passage of the 18th Amendment. While there might be some justification for the move to regulate certain processes, for example the registration of newspapers, news agencies and printing presses, and to collate circulation figures so that the rates of government ads can be settled upon, and ensure there are no overlaps in names and titles, there are certain provisions, including penalties that are cause for concern.

To begin with, the draft legislation appears to be heading into the realm of checking published content. For example, a newspaper’s declaration may be cancelled, for a number of technical reasons — if it carries “photostat material, [and] copies from other newspapers, including editorial [sic]”. Then, in addition to editors, it also, needlessly, holds individuals in charge of the pages responsible for any contraventions, prescribing either fines or jail terms as penalty. These debatable provisions are also worded loosely, lending themselves to abuse in the future — a point that ought to resonate deeply in a country that has been through long periods of draconian censorship. Surely, there is no need to embed such articles in legislation related to procedural matters when there is no dearth of laws, like those related to hate speech, incitement to violence, etc, that are similarly intended. The draft at hand needs more careful perusal, as well as consultation with stakeholders, before it is passed into law.

Published in Dawn, September 16th, 2017

Opinion

Who bears the cost?

Who bears the cost?

This small window of low inflation should compel a rethink of how the authorities and employers understand the average household’s

Editorial

Internet restrictions
Updated 23 Dec, 2024

Internet restrictions

Notion that Pakistan enjoys unprecedented freedom of expression difficult to reconcile with the reality of restrictions.
Bangladesh reset
23 Dec, 2024

Bangladesh reset

THE vibes were positive during Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s recent meeting with Bangladesh interim leader Dr...
Leaving home
23 Dec, 2024

Leaving home

FROM asylum seekers to economic migrants, the continuing exodus from Pakistan shows mass disillusionment with the...
Military convictions
Updated 22 Dec, 2024

Military convictions

Pakistan’s democracy, still finding its feet, cannot afford such compromises on core democratic values.
Need for talks
22 Dec, 2024

Need for talks

FOR a long time now, the country has been in the grip of relentless political uncertainty, featuring the...
Vulnerable vaccinators
22 Dec, 2024

Vulnerable vaccinators

THE campaign to eradicate polio from Pakistan cannot succeed unless the safety of vaccinators and security personnel...