Independence movements in Catalonia and Iraqi Kurdistan face the point of no return

Published September 22, 2017
People hold banners (left) during a pro-independence rally for Catalonia in Barcelona. A Kurdish boy sells banners supporting the referendum for independence for Kurdistan in Erbil, Iraq.—Reuters
People hold banners (left) during a pro-independence rally for Catalonia in Barcelona. A Kurdish boy sells banners supporting the referendum for independence for Kurdistan in Erbil, Iraq.—Reuters

ON Monday, the regional government in Iraqi Kurdistan plans to go ahead with a referendum on independence. Six days later, the regional government in Catalonia intends to hold its referendum on secession from Spain.

In both cases, most outsiders would prefer these votes weren’t happening at all. Readers may remember their growing calls for autonomy and self-rule. In March, Carles Puigdemont, the president of the regional government of Catalonia, told me that Catalans simply sought the same opportunity as Scots to determine their own future. In June, Bayan Sami Abdul Rahman, the leading Iraqi Kurdish representative in Washington, said that her region’s referendum would be non-binding — and was really about winning “a negotiated settlement with the government of Iraq”, not outright independence.

But as both votes now loom, the stakes have risen alarmingly.

Spanish authorities raided the offices of the Catalan regional government on Wednesday, seizing millions of ballot papers and arresting at least 14 senior Catalan officials. The move prompted protests in various cities, including Barcelona, the seaside Catalan capital, where some residents banged pots and pans in outrage as night fell. Even Spanish soccer club Barcelona, a global institution and a bastion of Catalan cultural pride, waded into the fray, issuing a statement defending Catalonia’s right to self-determination.

While the region’s leadership is adamant that the referendum will go ahead — and that a “yes” vote would swiftly be followed by a declaration of independence — the Spanish government views the referendum, as well as the steps taken by secessionist Catalan politicians to pave the way for a vote, as illegal. Earlier this month, when the Catalan parliament approved legislation authorising the referendum, Madrid denounced the vote as a “constitutional and democratic atrocity”, and it was later suspended by Spain’s constitutional court.

“If you care about the tranquility of most Catalans, give up this escalation of radicalism and disobedience,” Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy warned his Catalan counterparts on Wednesday.

Catalan officials were defiant. “Spain has de facto suspended the self-government of Catalonia and has applied a de facto state of emergency,” Puigdemont said in a statement.

“The issue that is at stake today isn’t the independence — or not — of Catalonia,” Raül Romeva, Catalonia’s foreign affairs chief, told reporters in Madrid, “but democracy in Spain and the European Union.”

Senior European Union officials, though, have distanced themselves from Catalan demands and say that an independent Catalonia would not be guaranteed a place in the continental bloc.

Of course, it’s not just Catalonia itself that has much to lose. The region accounts for 16 per cent of Spain’s population and, as Politico tabulated, a fifth of its economic output, a quarter of Spanish exports, and over half of new start-up investment in 2016. The prospect of giving up Catalonia’s economic power could be as scary in Madrid as are jail sentences in Barcelona.

The deepening impasse is the result of months of political jockeying and brinkmanship. Critics of the Catalan secessionists say they have steamrollered their opponents at home to engineer a dramatic confrontation with Madrid. Critics of Madrid say the Spanish government enabled this situation by refusing to engage at all with secessionists, who came to power in local elections, claim a popular mandate and have been clamouring for years for Madrid to consider the region’s longstanding nationalist aspirations. Both sides cast the other as “anti-democratic”.

Tensions are also rising head of the planned Monday referendum in Iraqi Kurdistan. As my colleagues Tamer El-Ghobashy and Mustafa Salim reported this week, the Kurdistan Regional Government, while much admired in the West, is finding itself increasingly alone in its independence bid.

Like its counterpart in Madrid, Iraq’s Supreme Court on Monday ordered the suspension of the referendum after the Iraqi parliament had declared it unconstitutional. That’s to be expected, but the Iraqi Kurds haven’t won much sympathy among their other neighbours, either. Both Turkey and Iran, home to sizeable ethnic Kurdish minorities, have come down hard against the referendum in recent weeks. US officials urged the KRG to reconsider, arguing that now was not the time to consider independence when the war against the militant Islamic State group is yet to be won. The White House issued a statement last week describing the referendum as “provocative and destabilising”.

Kurdish officials have repeatedly stressed that they want the vote to be seen not as a provocation, but rather as symbolic affirmation of what a vast majority of Iraqi Kurds want. “We will ourselves not initiate a clash or a fight,” Rowsch Shaways, a former deputy prime minister of Iraq and the head of the Kurdish delegation negotiating with Baghdad, said to my colleagues. “We are pledging dialogue and a peaceful solution.”

But the facts on the ground suggest conflict is likely. The disputed status of Kirkuk, an oil-rich province with a mixed Kurdish, Arab and Turkmen population that the KRG has included in its referendum, has already flared into violence. The government in Baghdad ordered the ouster of Kirkuk’s Kurdish governor, and there are fears of future potential clashes between the Iraqi military and the Kurdish peshmerga fighters who currently guard the provincial capital.

“These actions have emboldened Kurdish nationalism. This in turn has increased the anxieties of Arab leaders in Baghdad,” noted academics Morgan Kaplan and Ramzy Mardini. “With the stakes of the vote now perceived to be greater than before, both sides believe they cannot afford to concede. The dynamics are akin to a dangerous game of chicken, with no certainty of which actor, if any, will swerve first.”

Catalonia may be thousands of miles from Kirkuk — and enmeshed in a vastly different political context — but the same dynamic seems to playing out there. And while many in both regions may celebrate their right to cast a ballot, it’s far from certain that the outcome will be a happy one.

—By arrangement with The Washington Post

Published in Dawn, September 22nd, 2017

Opinion

Who bears the cost?

Who bears the cost?

This small window of low inflation should compel a rethink of how the authorities and employers understand the average household’s

Editorial

Internet restrictions
Updated 23 Dec, 2024

Internet restrictions

Notion that Pakistan enjoys unprecedented freedom of expression difficult to reconcile with the reality of restrictions.
Bangladesh reset
23 Dec, 2024

Bangladesh reset

THE vibes were positive during Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s recent meeting with Bangladesh interim leader Dr...
Leaving home
23 Dec, 2024

Leaving home

FROM asylum seekers to economic migrants, the continuing exodus from Pakistan shows mass disillusionment with the...
Military convictions
Updated 22 Dec, 2024

Military convictions

Pakistan’s democracy, still finding its feet, cannot afford such compromises on core democratic values.
Need for talks
22 Dec, 2024

Need for talks

FOR a long time now, the country has been in the grip of relentless political uncertainty, featuring the...
Vulnerable vaccinators
22 Dec, 2024

Vulnerable vaccinators

THE campaign to eradicate polio from Pakistan cannot succeed unless the safety of vaccinators and security personnel...