Threat to journalists

Published October 27, 2017

RECENT events have once again highlighted the multi-dimensional threat to journalists in Balochistan.

Starting Monday, virtually no newspapers have been delivered in the province following calls to newspaper offices by banned separatist groups that they would prevent the distribution of papers for not publishing news about their activities.

Printing presses in Quetta have also reportedly been warned.

Fearing they too would be targeted, agents, hawkers and transporters have refused to distribute any dailies in the province. About two weeks ago, the Balochistan Liberation Front issued a press release in which they threatened violence against media owners and journalists for being complicit, they alleged, in the news blackout.

By any standard, even in a country where the media is constantly under pressure, Balochistan is the worst place to be a journalist.

This is not only on account of the number of journalists who have been killed in the province in connection with their work, but also because media persons are forced to navigate threats emanating from multiple quarters in order to stay alive.

There are feuding tribes with shifting allegiances, extremist organisations and ruthless insurgent groups, as well as instruments of the state, including the Frontier Corps, intelligence agencies and the military; all of which want to use the media to further their agendas.

For journalists, that means an impossibly delicate balancing act: if they appear to ‘favour’ one group, it places them in the cross hairs of another.

Journalism in Balochistan, especially where local papers are concerned — and about Balochistan in the case of national dailies — has thus been virtually reduced to a farce.

Self-censorship is rampant; human rights violations, particularly in more far-flung areas, go unreported; and editorialising is a bygone practice in local papers, because no editor can afford to articulate a point of view. Press freedom is complemented by another constitutionally protected right — the right to information.

Both rights are being violated.

The state which should distinguish its actions from those of non-state actors instead of resorting to the same tactics, is partly responsible.

Information is not only that which is deemed kosher by official quarters; journalists have a duty to document the news, whatever the news may be, and convey it to the public.

The fact is, even while threats such as those hurled by separatist groups in the last few days are condemnable, intimidation at the hands of everyone is a constant.

Published in Dawn, October 27th, 2017

Opinion

Editorial

China security ties
Updated 14 Nov, 2024

China security ties

If China's security concerns aren't addressed satisfactorily, it may affect bilateral ties. CT cooperation should be pursued instead of having foreign forces here.
Steep price
14 Nov, 2024

Steep price

THE Hindu Kush-Himalayan region is in big trouble. A new study unveiled at the ongoing COP29 reveals that if high...
A high-cost plan
14 Nov, 2024

A high-cost plan

THE government has approved an expensive plan for FBR in the hope of tackling its deep-seated inefficiencies. The...
United stance
Updated 13 Nov, 2024

United stance

It would've been better if the OIC-Arab League summit had announced practical measures to punish Israel.
Unscheduled visit
13 Nov, 2024

Unscheduled visit

Unusual IMF visit shows the lender will closely watch implementation of programme goals to prevent it from derailing.
Bara’s businesswomen
13 Nov, 2024

Bara’s businesswomen

Bara’s brave women have proven that with the right support, societal barriers can be overcome.