GILGIT: Traders observed yet another strike in Gilgit-Baltistan on Thursday against the imposition of taxes on residents by the government without determining the constitutional statues of the region.

“The government’s attempt to divide trade bodies, bazaar committees, transporters and political parties has further strengthened the protesters who have now announced a series of strikes, long marches and sit-ins across GB against the imposition of taxes,” the demonstrators said.

Surprisingly, while life in the region came to a standstill following the strike, GB Chief Minister Hafeezur Rehman and his key ministers went to Lahore on Thursday to attend a wedding ceremony.

The strike call was given by GB Central Traders Association, Awami Action Committee, GB Chamber of Commerce and Industry, transporters’ association and opposition parties — Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf, Pakistan Peoples Party, Islami Tehreek Pakistan, Majlis Wahdatul Muslimeen and Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam-Fazl.

The imposition of taxes in GB was also opposed by the Supreme Court Bar Association, High Court Bar Association, Hotels Association, Petroleum Dealers Association, Transport Association, Timber Association and Minerals and Gems Association.

Markets, shops and business centres remained closed throughout the day in almost all 10 districts of the region, while public transport remained off the main roads, including the Karakoram Highway.

The protesters also threatened the government to face a Faizabad-like sit-in in every district. “A march towards Islamabad will also be organised if the government does not accept our demand,” said Nisar Hussain Raki, president of the GB Chamber of Commerce and Industry.

“First decide our constitutional position and then impose any tax being levied in other provinces,” he said, adding that it was unconstitutional to impose taxes on traders when no benefit was being derived from it by the locals, traders or even the government.

The president of the traders’ association, Muhammad Ibrahim, regretted that the traders were already facing huge losses because of the ‘cleaning taxes’ and now the government had introduced banking fee on transfers and transactions as well.

“How is the region supposed to flourish when the government won’t allow businesses to operate?” he asked.

Published in Dawn, December 22nd, 2017

Opinion

Editorial

China security ties
Updated 14 Nov, 2024

China security ties

If China's security concerns aren't addressed satisfactorily, it may affect bilateral ties. CT cooperation should be pursued instead of having foreign forces here.
Steep price
14 Nov, 2024

Steep price

THE Hindu Kush-Himalayan region is in big trouble. A new study unveiled at the ongoing COP29 reveals that if high...
A high-cost plan
14 Nov, 2024

A high-cost plan

THE government has approved an expensive plan for FBR in the hope of tackling its deep-seated inefficiencies. The...
United stance
Updated 13 Nov, 2024

United stance

It would've been better if the OIC-Arab League summit had announced practical measures to punish Israel.
Unscheduled visit
13 Nov, 2024

Unscheduled visit

Unusual IMF visit shows the lender will closely watch implementation of programme goals to prevent it from derailing.
Bara’s businesswomen
13 Nov, 2024

Bara’s businesswomen

Bara’s brave women have proven that with the right support, societal barriers can be overcome.