LAHORE: A senior lawyer on Wednesday told the Lahore High Court that the provincial government had been providing free education but the schools were not enough to accommodate all the children.

Advocate A K Dogar stated that the education being imparted in the government-owned schools was not of good quality but was rather below the standard. He said there were three categories of schools – government-run for the poor and privately-run for the rich, while the third one were madressahs (seminaries), that impart Islamic education free of cost.

He said the classification of the education system was unethical and against the basic principles of Islam.

Mr Dogar was advancing his arguments before a three-judge full bench seized with a number of petitions for the provision of quality education by the government and against the exorbitant fee structures of private schools.

The senior counsel argued that the government should be directed to establish more schools and raise their standard of education.

He said the private educational institutions had the right to do a lawful business, but they could not be permitted to mint money from the citizens in the name of education.

He said the people were forced to send their children to private schools by paying huge fees as the quality of education in the government-run schools had declined drastically.

He said the citizens had been deprived of their right to quality education due to the failure of the government and the private schools had been exploiting the situation.

He said the rulers always used the lame excuse of shortage of funds for establishing new schools, but never hesitated to spend public money for their personal benefits.

To a court query, the counsel said he did not want to get all private schools closed. However, he said these institutions could not be allowed to mint money.

The bench headed by Justice Abid Aziz Sheikh adjourned hearing till March 5, asking the provincial government’s lawyer to come up with his arguments.

The bench would also hear views of parents on the next hearing.

Justice Shams Mahmood Mirza and Justice Shahid Karim are other members of the full bench.

Published in Dawn, March 1st, 2018

Opinion

Who bears the cost?

Who bears the cost?

This small window of low inflation should compel a rethink of how the authorities and employers understand the average household’s

Editorial

Internet restrictions
Updated 23 Dec, 2024

Internet restrictions

Notion that Pakistan enjoys unprecedented freedom of expression difficult to reconcile with the reality of restrictions.
Bangladesh reset
23 Dec, 2024

Bangladesh reset

THE vibes were positive during Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s recent meeting with Bangladesh interim leader Dr...
Leaving home
23 Dec, 2024

Leaving home

FROM asylum seekers to economic migrants, the continuing exodus from Pakistan shows mass disillusionment with the...
Military convictions
Updated 22 Dec, 2024

Military convictions

Pakistan’s democracy, still finding its feet, cannot afford such compromises on core democratic values.
Need for talks
22 Dec, 2024

Need for talks

FOR a long time now, the country has been in the grip of relentless political uncertainty, featuring the...
Vulnerable vaccinators
22 Dec, 2024

Vulnerable vaccinators

THE campaign to eradicate polio from Pakistan cannot succeed unless the safety of vaccinators and security personnel...