ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Tuesday issued notices to former presidents retired Gen Pervez Musharraf and Asif Ali Zardari on a petition seeking recovery of huge losses Pakistan had incurred after promulgation of the National Reconciliation Ordinance (NRO) 2007.

The notices were issued when a three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice Mian Saqib Nisar took up the petition of Feroz Shah Gilani, president of the Lawyers Foundation for Justice. The petitioner has named Pervez Musharraf, Asif Zardari, former attorney general Malik Mohammad Qayyum and the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) as respondents to whom the notices were issued by the court.

In his petition, Mr Gilani has requested the court to order recovery of huge amounts of public money misappropriated and wasted by the respondents through unlawful means already on record in different judgements of the Supreme Court and high court.

Petition seeks recovery of huge losses national exchequer incurred after promulgation of NRO

The petitioner contends that Mr Musharraf subverted the Constitution by declaring emergency followed by the promulgation of the NRO, arbitrarily withdrawing criminal and corruption cases against the politicians, including Mr Zardari, which caused huge financial losses to the national exchequer.

According to the petition, since the Supreme Court in its landmark judgement of Dec 16, 2009 has declared the NRO void ab initio, the respondents are liable to compensate the losses and the damage suffered by the exchequer of debt-ridden Pakistan, including the loss of $60 million stashed in Swiss banks allegedly by Mr Zardari.

Likewise, former attorney general Qayyum wrote a letter to the attorney general for Geneva (Switzerland) withdrawing criminal and civil proceedings against Mr Zardari, but the Supreme Court in its 2009 judgement held that Mr Qayyum had written the letter in his personal capacity, against the Rules of Business, 1973.

The actions of Mr Musharraf and Mr Qayyum by promulgating the NRO caused huge losses amounting to billions of rupees to debt-ridden Pakistan.

Both wilfully violated the oath of office to the detriment of the country in violation of the rule of the law, particularly of Articles 2, 2A, 25, 227 of the Constitution, the petition alleges.

Published in Dawn, April 25th, 2018

Opinion

Editorial

Short-changed?
Updated 24 Nov, 2024

Short-changed?

As nations continue to argue, the international community must recognise that climate finance is not merely about numbers.
Overblown ‘threat’
24 Nov, 2024

Overblown ‘threat’

ON the eve of the PTI’s ‘do or die’ protest in the federal capital, there seemed to be little evidence of the...
Exclusive politics
24 Nov, 2024

Exclusive politics

THERE has been a gradual erasure of the voices of most marginalised groups from Pakistan’s mainstream political...
Counterterrorism plan
Updated 23 Nov, 2024

Counterterrorism plan

Lacunae in our counterterrorism efforts need to be plugged quickly.
Bullish stock market
23 Nov, 2024

Bullish stock market

NORMALLY, stock markets rise gradually. In recent months, however, Pakistan’s stock market has soared to one ...
Political misstep
Updated 23 Nov, 2024

Political misstep

To drag a critical ally like Saudi Arabia into unfounded conspiracies is detrimental to Pakistan’s foreign policy.