Blocked by the US

Published May 12, 2018

AN unusual decision by the US suggests that behind the ongoing diplomatic engagement lie deep strains that, if not managed carefully, could lead to a rupture in bilateral ties. Seeking to add Abdul Wali, aka Umer Khorasani, leader of the Jamaatul Ahrar faction of the banned TTP, to a UN sanctions committee list was a sensible move by Pakistan. Blocking the Pakistani move, as the US has done, is insensible. The JuA as an organisation was added to the UN sanctions committee list in mid-2017, while in October, a US drone is believed to have targeted Khorasani, who was initially reported to have been killed in the attack but survived. What, then, does the US hope to achieve by blocking Pakistan’s request? With no reasonable or positive answer readily available, it would appear that the US is using what it perceives to be leverage against Pakistan to bring this country’s actions fully in line with US demands in the region.

The US blocking manoeuvre in the UN has also come at a time when a tussle over diplomats between the US and Pakistan may significantly disrupt diplomatic ties. The threatened imposition of travel-related restrictions on Pakistani diplomats and their families in the US is now a reality. In retaliation against the unfair US move, Pakistan has announced reciprocal measures against US diplomats in this country. The ill-timed squabble is likely diverting diplomatic energies away from substantive issues. It appears that the US is intent on ratcheting up pressure on Pakistan, presumably as part of the do-more mantra that is once again being shrilly deployed. But such manoeuvres are unlikely to be effective because even if short-term concessions are wrested from Pakistan, they will come at the cost of further vitiating the diplomatic environment in which the two countries have to try and address long-term problems in the region.

The decision to block the listing of Khorasani in the UN sanctions committee is particularly egregious because it suggests the US is willing to corrupt anti-terrorism measures to deny Pakistan its legitimate security goals. The JuA and its leader are a serious problem for Pakistan because the group has repeatedly demonstrated its capacity to launch high-profile and deadly attacks inside this country. When US President Donald Trump unveiled his so-called South Asia strategy last year, US officials insisted that a sustainable, cooperative relationship was being sought with Pakistan. That would mean addressing some of this country’s legitimate security concerns rather than heaping pressure on Pakistan to acquiesce to a US war strategy in Afghanistan that has been criticised by many US analysts outside the Trump administration. Khorasani of the JuA is a significant threat, and the UN sanctions committee should not be used to deny Pakistan a legitimate request. Pakistan and the US need to return to effective engagement immediately.

Published in Dawn, May 12th, 2018

Opinion

Editorial

Economic plan
Updated 02 Jan, 2025

Economic plan

Absence of policy reforms allows the bureaucracy a lot of space to wriggle out of responsibility.
On life support
02 Jan, 2025

On life support

PAKISTAN stands at a precarious crossroads as we embark on a new year. Pildat’s Quality of Democracy report has...
Harsh sentence
02 Jan, 2025

Harsh sentence

USING lawfare to swiftly get rid of political opponents makes a mockery of the legal system, especially when ...
Looking ahead
Updated 01 Jan, 2025

Looking ahead

The dawn of 2025 brings with it hope of a more constructive path to much-needed stability.
On the front lines
Updated 01 Jan, 2025

On the front lines

THE human cost of terrorism in 2024 was staggering. The ISPR reports 383 officers and soldiers embraced martyrdom...
Avoiding reform
01 Jan, 2025

Avoiding reform

PAKISTAN’S economic growth significantly slowed down to a modest 0.92pc during the first quarter of the present...