30 years after Myanmar uprising, dissidents fear struggle forgotten

Published August 7, 2018
This file photo taken in early August 1988 shows demonstrators gathering in central Yangon to protest against the government.—AFP
This file photo taken in early August 1988 shows demonstrators gathering in central Yangon to protest against the government.—AFP

YANGON: Ko Shell had his teeth knocked out during torture sessions and spent 14 years in six jails, but as the 30th anniversary looms of the famed Myanmar pro-democracy uprising that led to his incarceration, he says those sacrifices are being forgotten.

Sitting in a tea shop in downtown Yangon, he worries history is not being taught to the younger generation, a frustration mirroring wider disappointment with the government among many jailed for opposing the junta which ruled for four decades. “All the true stories were not shared with the public,” the 49-year-old said.

Military regimes in Myanmar imprisoned nearly 10,000 people since the army first seized power in 1962, sending the country into decades of isolation.

Most were jailed in the years after nationwide strikes on Aug 8, 1988, part of broader anti-junta demonstrations that catapulted Myanmar leader Aung San Suu Kyi into the spotlight. The daughter of Myanmar’s independence hero, Suu Kyi was swept up in the revolt shortly after returning from a cozy life in England to care for her sick mother.

But despite then spending a combined 15 years under house arrest by the paranoid regime, Suu Kyi has emphasised reconciling with the generals after winning landmark elections in 2015. While a third of MPs in her party have served time for activism, prominent members of the 1988 protests were passed over when candidates for parliament were chosen to run.

The lack of compensation, monuments or other forms of redress for victims have caused angst, while many can’t get the work they seek due to the stigma of jail. “Most of them face difficulties,” said Ko Shell, a taxi driver.

History is a dangerous subject in the Buddhist-majority country, where the military promotes a narrative of unifying a country riven by religious and ethnic faultlines. The toxic issue of belonging is highlighted by the Rohingya crisis, where the Muslim minority is referred to as “Bengali” to cast them as immigrants from Bangladesh.

With many former junta members enjoying normal lives or still involved in government, dredging up memories of political prisoners is not common. But Kyaw Soe Win from the Yangon-based Assistance Association for Political Prisoners hopes to change that.

The museum he helped create is one of the only places in Myanmar where visitors can learn what inmates endured. “School texts, they never show the real history,” he said, standing in front of a recreation of a prison cell.

The limited awareness about 1988 is part of a larger gap that leaves many susceptible to simplistic versions of history. “A big problem in Myanmar today is the lack of a critical discussion on the country’s recent past,” said writer Thant Myint-U.

Frustration with Myanmar’s government under Suu Kyi has risen since she took office more than two years ago. Suu Kyi has also been singled out for lacklustre economic reforms and top-down management. The next national elections are due in 2020 and a group of veteran 1988 leaders have announced plans to launch an alternative to Suu Kyi’s National League for Democracy (NLD).

Min Thu, a 57-year-old NLD lawmaker who spent 10 years in jail, acknowledged the slow pace of reform but compared it favourably to the past. “They [people] can reveal their opinion freely and they can criticise,” he told AFP at an annual congress in Yangon. He said the party was providing some assistance to former prisoners. Without naming the military, he blamed the imperfect progress on decades of mismanagement, but said voters can now pick new governments at elections if unsatisfied.

But most former political prisoners are concerned about today, not the next vote. Ko Shell says he has family problems because his stretches behind bars make home life difficult. “I want to be free all the time,” he said.

Published in Dawn, August 7th, 2018

Opinion

Who bears the cost?

Who bears the cost?

This small window of low inflation should compel a rethink of how the authorities and employers understand the average household’s

Editorial

Internet restrictions
23 Dec, 2024

Internet restrictions

JUST how much longer does the government plan on throttling the internet is a question up in the air right now....
Bangladesh reset
23 Dec, 2024

Bangladesh reset

THE vibes were positive during Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s recent meeting with Bangladesh interim leader Dr...
Leaving home
23 Dec, 2024

Leaving home

FROM asylum seekers to economic migrants, the continuing exodus from Pakistan shows mass disillusionment with the...
Military convictions
Updated 22 Dec, 2024

Military convictions

Pakistan’s democracy, still finding its feet, cannot afford such compromises on core democratic values.
Need for talks
22 Dec, 2024

Need for talks

FOR a long time now, the country has been in the grip of relentless political uncertainty, featuring the...
Vulnerable vaccinators
22 Dec, 2024

Vulnerable vaccinators

THE campaign to eradicate polio from Pakistan cannot succeed unless the safety of vaccinators and security personnel...