PESHAWAR: After remaining absconder for around 28 years, accused in the murder case of young journalist Mansoor Ahmad was arrested when his pre-arrest bail plea was turned down by Peshawar district and sessions judge.

Soon after District Judge Mohammad Younas pronounced the order, the personnel of University Campus police took the suspect, Mohammad Sohail, into custody.

Late Mansoor Ahmad, 26, was a special correspondent of The Democrat newspaper. He was attacked at his residence situated at Postal Colony, University of Peshawar. The attackers hit him on his head and threw acid on him during wee hours on June 27, 1990.

He had received serious burns injuries and expired after few days of the occurrence. The then prime minister Benazir Bhutto and chief minister Aftab Sherpao had ordered his treatment abroad. He had expired at Islamabad International Airport before he was shifted to a plane so as to take him to London for specialised treatment.

The attack on Mansoor had triggered widespread protests by journalists across the country and Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists and Khyber Union of Journalists had staged several demonstrations.

A local judicial magistrate had declared Mohammad Sohail a proclaimed offender on June 9, 1996, and issued his perpetual arrest warrants. The suspect remained absconder for over two decades and surfaced few days ago and filed pre-arrest bail petition.

The district judge had earlier granted him interim pre-arrest bail on September 18, but did not confirm the same after completion of arguments by both the parties. The court pronounced that the petitioner did not deserve to be extended the concession of pre-arrest bail.

There were reports that the petitioner had been absconding in Afghanistan.

The local police had also been probing the case to ascertain whether the deceased was killed because of his journalistic work or was having any personal issue with the petitioner.

A panel of lawyers including Syed Abdul Fayyaz, Ali Azeem Afridi and Yousaf Riaz appeared for the deceased’s family and contended that the petitioner had absconded for 28 long years. They said that no mala-fide was pointed out by the petitioner on behalf of the local police or the complainant.

They contended that police were still probing the case which was not possible without the arrest of the accused. They requested the court not to confirm his pre-arrest bail as it would inflict irreparable loss to the prosecution case.

The counsel of the petitioner, Lateef Afridi, contended that there was no evidence against his client to connect him with the commission of the offence.

Published in Dawn, November 21st, 2018

Opinion

Editorial

At breaking point
Updated 20 Jan, 2025

At breaking point

The country’s jails serve as monuments to bureaucratic paralysis rather than justice.
Lower growth
20 Jan, 2025

Lower growth

THE IMF has slightly marked down its previous growth forecast for Pakistan’s economy from 3.2pc to 3pc for the...
Nutrition challenge
20 Jan, 2025

Nutrition challenge

WHEN a country’s children go hungry, its future withers. In Pakistan, where over 40pc of children under five are...
Kurram conundrum
Updated 19 Jan, 2025

Kurram conundrum

If terrorists and sectarian groups — regardless of their confessional affiliations — had been neutralised earlier, we would not be at this juncture today.
EV policy
19 Jan, 2025

EV policy

IT is pleasantly surprising that the authorities are moving with such purpose to potentially revolutionise...
Varsity woes
19 Jan, 2025

Varsity woes

GIVEN that most bureaucrats in our country are not really known for contributions to pedagogical excellence, it ...