IHC asks Usman Dar why petition seeking Zardari's disqualification should be heard on 'priority'

Published January 29, 2019
Usman Dar speaks to media outside the Islamabad High Court on Tuesday. — DawnNewsTV
Usman Dar speaks to media outside the Islamabad High Court on Tuesday. — DawnNewsTV

The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Tuesday acknowledged that courts are the legal forum for petitions seeking disqualification of a public office holder under Article 63 and 63 of the Constitution.

The high court was hearing objections to a petition seeking the disqualification of former president Asif Ali Zardari that was filed by Special Assistant to the Prime Minister on Youth Affairs Mohammad Usman Dar. The registrar had raised administrative objections over the petition.

During the hearing today, IHC Chief Justice Athar Minallah asked Dar's counsel why "political requests" were brought to courts even though the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) was the legal forum for such appeals.

"Political matters should be solved by political forums," Justice Minallah said, adding that there were already several pending cases in courts.

"Parliament can form a committee on this matter," he suggested. "This is the time to strengthen the parliament."

Sikander Bashir, Dar's counsel, argued that the case did not fall under ECP's jurisdiction as it sought disqualification under Article 62(1)(f). He said that there were documents that proved Zardari had concealed his assets. He also referred to a verdict passed by the Sindh High Court in this regard.

The court accepted Bashir's arguments and dismissed the objections. However, Justice Minallah asked Bashir to convince the court as to why his client's petition should be heard on a "priority basis" when there was already a backlog of cases.

"You will have to convince the court that this case comes under public interest," the chief justice said.

The court will hear Dar's arguments over the case being one of public interest in the next hearing.

Talking to the media outside the court, PTI leader Dar predicted that the verdict in the petition seeking Zardari's disqualification will be "historic".

"Justice Minallah has issued many historic verdicts in the past," he said outside the high court building. "The decision of Zardari's disqualification case will also be historic."

"This is an open and shut case. I believe that Zardari will be disqualified for life," he claimed. Dar regretted that Sindh Chief Minister Murad Ali Shah had never asked Zardari where the latter had acquired so much wealth.

PTI leaders Dar and Khurram Sher Zaman had filed petitions seeking the disqualification of the former president, alleging that Zardari had concealed his assets and was therefore dishonest. The petitions sought a declaration that Zardari was neither righteous nor sagacious in terms of Article 62(1)(f) of the Constitution and also Section 231 of the Election Act, 2017 and, therefore, not qualified to be elected as a lawmaker.

The petitions also demanded that the ECP should hold that Zardari was not qualified to be elected or chosen or to officiate as or exercise powers of the “party head” within the meaning of Article 63A of the Constitution, including the offices of PPP-Parliamentarian president and PPP co-chairperson. The ECP, the National Assembly secretary and Zardari are respondents in the petitions.

Opinion

Editorial

Geopolitical games
Updated 18 Dec, 2024

Geopolitical games

While Assad may be gone — and not many are mourning the end of his brutal rule — Syria’s future does not look promising.
Polio’s toll
18 Dec, 2024

Polio’s toll

MONDAY’s attacks on polio workers in Karak and Bannu that martyred Constable Irfanullah and wounded two ...
Development expenditure
18 Dec, 2024

Development expenditure

PAKISTAN’S infrastructure development woes are wide and deep. The country must annually spend at least 10pc of its...
Risky slope
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Risky slope

Inflation likely to see an upward trajectory once high base effect tapers off.
Digital ID bill
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Digital ID bill

Without privacy safeguards, a centralised digital ID system could be misused for surveillance.
Dangerous revisionism
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Dangerous revisionism

When hatemongers call for digging up every mosque to see what lies beneath, there is a darker agenda driving matters.