Brussels: European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker welcomes British Prime Minister Theresa May.—AFP
Brussels: European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker welcomes British Prime Minister Theresa May.—AFP

BRUSSELS: British Prime Minister Theresa May and EU Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker sparred on Thursday during “robust” talks on the UK’s Brexit plans, and agreed to hold more negotiations that could push the sealing of any deal to within a month of Britain’s scheduled departure.

Looking at the ever tighter deadline and yawning divisions, May said “it’s not going to be easy” but vowed: “I am going to deliver Brexit. I am going to deliver it on time.”

The two leaders agreed to meet for more talks “before the end of February to take stock of these discussions,” a joint statement said. Two years ago, May set Brexit day as March 29 and originally plans were to have a deal in place six months ahead of time.

Both sides still fundamentally disagree on whether a draft legal withdrawal agreement could be changed to take the latest British objections into account, greatly reducing the chances of a quick breakthrough.

“The EU27 will not reopen the Withdrawal Agreement, which represents a carefully balanced compromise between the European Union and the U.K., in which both sides have made significant concessions,” the joint statement said.

The simmering tension was evident in the leaders’ body language as they met in a stiff ceremony.

Instead of his usual jovial kisses, Juncker held out his hand for May to shake and quickly ushered her off into his offices. One reporter shouted at her: “Is this hell, prime minister?” It was a reference to comments by European Council President Donald Tusk, who exacerbated the frosty climate on Wednesday by wondering aloud what “special place in hell” might be reserved for those who backed Brexit with no idea of how to deliver it.

Highlighting the sensitivities, a public welcome appearance on camera between May and Tusk was cancelled hours before the encounter.

UK officials said May’s primary concern was not to be “trapped” in a system that could see Britain linked to the EU in a customs union for an indefinite time.

Britain’s Parliament voted down May’s Brexit deal last month, largely because of concerns about a provision for the border between the UK’s Northern Ireland and EU member Ireland. The mechanism, known as the backstop, is a safeguard that would keep the UK in a customs union with the EU to remove the need for checks along the Irish border until a permanent new trading relationship is in place.

Thursday’s statement said that May “raised various options for dealing with these concerns in the context of the Withdrawal Agreement.” Many pro-Brexit British lawmakers say they won’t vote for the withdrawal agreement unless the backstop is removed.

May is seeking changes in the 585-page legally binding withdrawal agreement to achieve that, something which the 27 other EU leaders continue to vehemently oppose.

Juncker and the other EU leaders have agreed to look for a compromise in a political text accompanying the withdrawal agreement, but not in the legal document itself.

Published in Dawn, February 8th, 2019

Opinion

Editorial

Kurram atrocity
Updated 22 Nov, 2024

Kurram atrocity

It would be a monumental mistake for the state to continue ignoring the violence in Kurram.
Persistent grip
22 Nov, 2024

Persistent grip

PAKISTAN has now registered 50 polio cases this year. We all saw it coming and yet there was nothing we could do to...
Green transport
22 Nov, 2024

Green transport

THE government has taken a commendable step by announcing a New Energy Vehicle policy aiming to ensure that by 2030,...
Military option
Updated 21 Nov, 2024

Military option

While restoring peace is essential, addressing Balochistan’s socioeconomic deprivation is equally important.
HIV/AIDS disaster
21 Nov, 2024

HIV/AIDS disaster

A TORTUROUS sense of déjà vu is attached to the latest health fiasco at Multan’s Nishtar Hospital. The largest...
Dubious pardon
21 Nov, 2024

Dubious pardon

IT is disturbing how a crime as grave as custodial death has culminated in an out-of-court ‘settlement’. The...