Apex court reverses ex-CJP’s orders against PKLI management

Published March 1, 2019
The court discards ad hoc committee, allows Dr Akhtar to go abroad, directs the govt to run the PKLI under its Act.— AFP/File
The court discards ad hoc committee, allows Dr Akhtar to go abroad, directs the govt to run the PKLI under its Act.— AFP/File

LAHORE: A three-judge Supreme Court bench on Thursday reversed all previous orders passed by former chief justice Mian Saqib Nisar in a suo motu case against alleged corruption in the Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute (PKLI) and huge salaries of its president and other staff.

The former chief justice had ordered the Anti-Corruption Establishment (ACE) to hold an inquiry into alleged misappropriation of funds at the PKLI after a court-appointed forensic audit expert doubted transparency in the institutes’ financial affairs.

The former chief justice had also appointed an ad hoc committee headed by a retired judge to run the institute on behalf of the apex court and ordered amendment to Pakistan Kidney & Liver Institute and Research Centre Act 2014.

The court had also barred its president Dr Saeed Akhtar from leaving the country.

The suo motu case was taken up by the three-judge bench headed by Justice Manzoor Ahmad Malik at the Lahore registry. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah and Justice Yahya Afridi were other members of the bench.

ACE acting director general, health secretary and other officials of the Punjab government were present in the court with the assistance of law officers.

Revoking previous orders, the bench directed the provincial government to run the PKLI under its Act and also allowed Dr Akhtar to go abroad. The bench also discarded the ad hoc committee.

Asked about the legitimacy of the inquiry conducted by the ACE into the PKLI affairs, a law officer told the judges that a bench headed by the former chief justice had ordered that probe.

Justice Malik observed that every institution was supposed to work within its limits. He told the law officer that the bench was withdrawing the order for the inquiry as being unnecessary and a judicial overreach. With these directions, the bench disposed of the suo motu.

In its report filed on Jan 12 last before a bench headed by former chief justice, the ACE had recommended registration of an FIR against the management of the PKLI and others.

The report stated that the project of the PKLI was supposed to complete by December 2017. However, it was still under construction. It said the government officials were involved in misappropriation of funds and a detailed investigation could be held after registration of a case. The report pointed out that no action had been taken against the contractors for delaying the project.

Published in Dawn, March 1st, 2019

Opinion

Editorial

China security ties
Updated 14 Nov, 2024

China security ties

If China's security concerns aren't addressed satisfactorily, it may affect bilateral ties. CT cooperation should be pursued instead of having foreign forces here.
Steep price
14 Nov, 2024

Steep price

THE Hindu Kush-Himalayan region is in big trouble. A new study unveiled at the ongoing COP29 reveals that if high...
A high-cost plan
14 Nov, 2024

A high-cost plan

THE government has approved an expensive plan for FBR in the hope of tackling its deep-seated inefficiencies. The...
United stance
Updated 13 Nov, 2024

United stance

It would've been better if the OIC-Arab League summit had announced practical measures to punish Israel.
Unscheduled visit
13 Nov, 2024

Unscheduled visit

Unusual IMF visit shows the lender will closely watch implementation of programme goals to prevent it from derailing.
Bara’s businesswomen
13 Nov, 2024

Bara’s businesswomen

Bara’s brave women have proven that with the right support, societal barriers can be overcome.