LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has suspended a criminal case lodged by the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) against a sugar mills on charges of tax fraud amounting to millions of rupees.

SW Sugar Mills through a writ petition challenged the FIR registered by the Inland Revenue Department of the FBR for being an act beyond its jurisdiction.

Defending the FIR, department’s legal adviser Zainul Abideen argued that the mill committed a huge tax fraud by suppressing the sales and actual stock of sugar. He said the assessment of tax and completion of assessment proceedings were not prerequisite for initiation of a criminal action.

He said as per settled principles of law, civil and criminal proceedings could be initiated side by side and the impugned FIR was not liable to be quashed. Representing the mill, Advocate Ijaz Awan argued that the FIR had been lodged with ulterior motives by unlawfully converting civil proceedings into criminal.

He stated that in the absence of tax assessment under the Sales Tax Act 1990 and without knowing the amount/loss involved neither compound-ability was possible nor the award of sentence was justifiable in any manner. He said directly resorting to criminal proceedings was not the mandate of the sales tax act as mandatory prerequisites had been blatantly ignored by the respondent before lodging the impugned FIR.

The counsel pointed out that the issue in hand had already been settled by two-judge bench of the high court in a 2014 judgment titled “Taj International verses FBR & others”. The instant petition should also be decided in the light of that judgment, added the counsel.

However, Justice Sajid Mahmood Sethi observed that the judgment cited by the petitioner’s counsel was under challenge before the Supreme Court and the respondent/FBR had also not initiated any recovery proceedings by issuing a show-cause notice to the petitioner/mill.

The judge disposed of the petition ruling that the operation of the impugned FIR shall remain stayed till decision either by the Supreme Court or determination of due amount through adjudication process by the respondent department through show-cause notice.

Published in Dawn, March 8th, 2019

Editorial

A hasty retreat
28 Nov, 2024

A hasty retreat

POLITICAL immaturity has cost the PTI dearly once again. It appears things may not have come to this had Bushra ...
Lebanon truce
28 Nov, 2024

Lebanon truce

WILL it hold? That is the question many in the Middle East and beyond will be asking after a 60-day ceasefire ...
MDR anomaly removed
28 Nov, 2024

MDR anomaly removed

THE State Bank’s decision to remove its minimum deposit rate requirement for conventional banks on deposits from...
Islamabad march
Updated 27 Nov, 2024

Islamabad march

WITH emotions running high, chaos closes in. As these words were being written, rumours and speculation were all...
Policing the internet
27 Nov, 2024

Policing the internet

IT is chilling to witness how Pakistan — a nation that embraced the freedoms of modern democracy, and the tech ...
Correcting sports priorities
27 Nov, 2024

Correcting sports priorities

IT has been a lingering battle that has cast a shadow over sports in Pakistan: who are the national sports...