SC order to regularise structures in Banigala has opened floodgate of petitions: IHC

Published March 10, 2019
Islamabad High Court (IHC) has observed that the Supreme Court’s nod for regularisation of unauthorised constructions in Banigala and the Grand Hyatt plot has opened a floodgate of petitions, seeking regularisation of illegal buildings in other areas of the federal capital as well. — AFP/File
Islamabad High Court (IHC) has observed that the Supreme Court’s nod for regularisation of unauthorised constructions in Banigala and the Grand Hyatt plot has opened a floodgate of petitions, seeking regularisation of illegal buildings in other areas of the federal capital as well. — AFP/File

ISLAMABAD: Islamabad High Court (IHC) has observed that the Supreme Court’s nod for regularisation of unauthorised constructions in Banigala and the Grand Hyatt plot has opened a floodgate of petitions, seeking regularisation of illegal buildings in other areas of the federal capital as well.

The observation was passed by a two-member bench of the IHC in a judgement on a petition seeking regularisation of buildings constructed in 2005 on a plot earmarked for a park.

The order passed by the bench, comprising IHC Chief Justice Athar Minallah and Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb, said: “It is noted that the regularisation of ‘Constitution One’ [Grand Hyatt] and the illegal buildings constructed in the protected areas of Banigala and Mohra Noor has created an awkward situation, which is pleaded as ground for regularising of illegal construction throughout the area comprising Islamabad Capital Territory. This Court [IHC] has been inundated with constitutional petitions seeking the same relief.”

Last year, a Supreme Court bench headed by then chief justice of Pakistan Mian Saqib Nisar ordered regularisation of illegal constructions in Banigala and the Grand Hyatt Hotel.

Govt directed to clarify why illegal construction carried out in violation of laws in other parts of Islamabad may not be regularised as well

The IHC, however, was of the view that the Supreme Court’s decision in both the matter was a result of improper assistance by the relevant stakeholders.

The IHC order read: “It appears to us that in both the cases proper assistance was not extended to the august Supreme Court.”

Earlier, a single-member bench and a two-member division bench of the IHC held that construction of residential apartments on a plot meant for Grand Hyatt Hotel was illegal. Likewise, IHC’s larger bench in Shahzada Sikandarul Mulk case declared unauthorised structures in Banigala as illegal.

The bench had also formed a high powered commission to examine the cases for regularisation of illegal constructions in Banigala and Mohra Noor as well.

CDA’s former legal adviser Kashif Ali Malik, who pursued the Constitution One case in the IHC and was opposing regularisation of illegal constructions in Banigala, was compelled to resign a couple of months ago.

In Sikandarul Mulk case, IHC focused on the environmental degradation and climate change.

In its order dated March 7, 2019, the IHC noted: “The federal government, through its policy and conduct, is under obligation to dispel the impression that the regularisation policy is restricted to and is formulated for the privileged classes only. It is the duty of the federal government to satisfy this Court that the policy regarding regularisation of construction made in violation of the enforced laws is for every citizen and not only for a few.”

Subsequently, the IHC accepted a request for adjournment of the case and directed the federal government to “unequivocally state its policy on the next date of hearing”.

It added: “The federal government is expected to satisfy this Court that why all similarly placed persons may not be treated equally or that why illegal construction carried out in violation of the aforementioned laws within 1,400 sq miles of the Islamabad Capital Territory may not be regularised by treating them at par with the regularisation of Constitution One and the buildings within the area of Banigala and Mohra Noor.

“The federal government and the Capital Development Authority are directed to submit their respective reports before the next date of hearing. The [registrar] office is directed to re-list the appeal on April 4, 2019,” the order concluded.

Published in Dawn, March 10th, 2019

Opinion

Editorial

Military option
Updated 21 Nov, 2024

Military option

While restoring peace is essential, addressing Balochistan’s socioeconomic deprivation is equally important.
HIV/AIDS disaster
21 Nov, 2024

HIV/AIDS disaster

A TORTUROUS sense of déjà vu is attached to the latest health fiasco at Multan’s Nishtar Hospital. The largest...
Dubious pardon
21 Nov, 2024

Dubious pardon

IT is disturbing how a crime as grave as custodial death has culminated in an out-of-court ‘settlement’. The...
Islamabad protest
Updated 20 Nov, 2024

Islamabad protest

As Nov 24 draws nearer, both the PTI and the Islamabad administration must remain wary and keep within the limits of reason and the law.
PIA uncertainty
20 Nov, 2024

PIA uncertainty

THE failed attempt to privatise the national flag carrier late last month has led to a fierce debate around the...
T20 disappointment
20 Nov, 2024

T20 disappointment

AFTER experiencing the historic high of the One-day International series triumph against Australia, Pakistan came...