Model courts

Published April 10, 2019

ACCORDING to Article 37 (d) of the Constitution, every citizen of the state has the right to “inexpensive and expeditious” justice. And yet, one of the foremost grievances against the legal system in this country is its sheer lethargy, resulting in a massive backlog of cases, many of which are described as ‘frivolous’ by litigators who say these will never be resolved, wasting precious time and resources in the process. At the beginning of the year, an estimated 1.9m cases awaited the new chief justice, Asif Saeed Khosa, who had said he wanted to build “... a dam against undue and unnecessary delays in judicial determination of cases”. He proposed the setting up of model courts in every district of the country to conduct daily trials on murder and narcotics-related cases (for now). The idea of model courts, as they exist today, was first introduced by him. The courts were under the supervision of Justice Mansoor Ali Shah, albeit restricted to Punjab. Unlike the district courts, which suffer from budgetary constraints, model courts have greater administrative and technological facilities. They deliver verdicts under an agreed timeline, without adjournment. Additionally, a monitoring and evaluation cell under the command of the chief justice or chairman of the National Judicial (Policy Making) Committee reviews the workings of the courts every two months.

While all this sounds commendable in theory — and model courts have indeed had success in parts of the country — introducing them across Pakistan will present its own set of challenges, particularly when we remember Chief Justice Khosa’s own complaint about the lack of judges in the country. There is also a fear that, if not handled carefully, model courts may eventually devolve into a parallel legal system, as opposed to remaining a complementary one. Lastly, despite the maxim that justice delayed is justice denied, ‘speedy justice’ can be misused as a cover for denying a fair trial. In the quick dispensation of ‘justice’, due process must still be ensured.

Published in Dawn, April 10th, 2019

Opinion

Who bears the cost?

Who bears the cost?

This small window of low inflation should compel a rethink of how the authorities and employers understand the average household’s

Editorial

Internet restrictions
Updated 23 Dec, 2024

Internet restrictions

Notion that Pakistan enjoys unprecedented freedom of expression difficult to reconcile with the reality of restrictions.
Bangladesh reset
23 Dec, 2024

Bangladesh reset

THE vibes were positive during Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s recent meeting with Bangladesh interim leader Dr...
Leaving home
23 Dec, 2024

Leaving home

FROM asylum seekers to economic migrants, the continuing exodus from Pakistan shows mass disillusionment with the...
Military convictions
Updated 22 Dec, 2024

Military convictions

Pakistan’s democracy, still finding its feet, cannot afford such compromises on core democratic values.
Need for talks
22 Dec, 2024

Need for talks

FOR a long time now, the country has been in the grip of relentless political uncertainty, featuring the...
Vulnerable vaccinators
22 Dec, 2024

Vulnerable vaccinators

THE campaign to eradicate polio from Pakistan cannot succeed unless the safety of vaccinators and security personnel...