Transfer of ‘fake’ accounts case to Islamabad in accordance with SC order, rules SHC

Published April 12, 2019
The bench rules March 15 order was a speaking and reasoned order, which did not warrant interference by this court. — Photo courtesy of SHC website
The bench rules March 15 order was a speaking and reasoned order, which did not warrant interference by this court. — Photo courtesy of SHC website

KARACHI: The Sindh High Court (SHC) has ruled that the order of a banking court transferring a ‘fake’ accounts and money laundering case against co-chairman of Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Asif Ali Zardari, his sister and others to Islamabad was in accordance with the Supreme Court’s judgement.

On April 2, a two-judge SHC bench headed by Chief Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh dismissed a set of applications moved by Mr Zardari and others against the banking court’s order, through a short order.

According to the detailed order issued on Thursday, the main thrust of the arguments advanced by the lawyers for the applicants was that under the orders of the apex court, the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) was not authorised to get the case in question (FIR No. 04/18) transferred from a banking court in Karachi to an accountability court at Islamabad and the allegations contained in the FIR did not constitute an offence falling within the ambit of the NAB Ordinance.

While reproducing some parts of the apex court’s Jan 7 judgement, the SHC ruled: “After examining the judgement of Honourable Supreme Court, we do not see any ambiguity in the said judgment which would lead us to conclude that the transfer of the case pending before the special court (arising out of FIR No. 04/2018) was excluded from the ambit of the judgement when it was ordered that a reference by the NAB be filed before the accountability court, Islamabad.”

Referring to the reliance on Article 187(2) by the lawyers for applicants, the SHC bench said the same was not applicable in the current scenario.

“As we have concluded that the transfer of the case arising out of FIR No. 04/2018 and the filing of reference at Islamabad is a consequence of the material placed before the NAB and directions of the Honourable Supreme Court,” it added.

The bench also observed that the March 15 order of the banking court was a speaking and reasoned order, which did not warrant interference by this court.

The former president, his sister Faryal Talpur, detained chairman of Omni Group Anwar Majeed, his sons, former chairman of the Pakistan Stock Exchange Hussain Lawai and others had challenged the March 15 trial court order before the SHC.

The Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) had named Mr Zardari, his sister Ms Talpur, Anwar Majeed, his sons and over 10 others as suspects in the interim charge sheet filed before the banking court in FIR No. 04/18 in August last year for the alleged money laundering of over Rs4 billion through fake bank accounts.

Published in Dawn, April 12th, 2019

Opinion

Editorial

Anti-women state
Updated 25 Nov, 2024

Anti-women state

GLOBALLY, women are tormented by the worst tools of exploitation: rape, sexual abuse, GBV, IPV, and more are among...
IT sector concerns
25 Nov, 2024

IT sector concerns

PRIME Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s ambitious plan to increase Pakistan’s IT exports from $3.2bn to $25bn in the ...
Israel’s war crimes
25 Nov, 2024

Israel’s war crimes

WHILE some powerful states are shielding Israel from censure, the court of global opinion is quite clear: there is...
Short-changed?
Updated 24 Nov, 2024

Short-changed?

As nations continue to argue, the international community must recognise that climate finance is not merely about numbers.
Overblown ‘threat’
24 Nov, 2024

Overblown ‘threat’

ON the eve of the PTI’s ‘do or die’ protest in the federal capital, there seemed to be little evidence of the...
Exclusive politics
24 Nov, 2024

Exclusive politics

THERE has been a gradual erasure of the voices of most marginalised groups from Pakistan’s mainstream political...