18th amendment

Published April 16, 2019

THE promulgation of the 18th Amendment in 2010 was a milestone in the political and constitutional history of Pakistan. The amendment was passed with the consent of all political parties of the time and made Pakistan stronger than ever.

Pakistan, which historically has been an over-centralised state, was decentralized, and the federating units got more powers and became autonomous as 46 subjects were transfered from the centre to the provinces.

They are now in many ways the master of their own fate. Not only were the political powers devolved with the abolition of the concurrent list in the constitution, fiscal decentralisation also took place. After the incorporation of the provision related to NFC by making changes in Article 160, the share of provinces in this federal divisible pool has increased.

The 18th Amendment has delivered some desired results. The number of universities and campuses has increased. The federating units are now investing more and more in education and health departments.

However, the opponents of the amendment are bent on reversing it. They are of the view that after the passage of the amendment, Pakistan has moved fast towards economic instability.

They allege that the amendment has fuelled corruption and bad governance in the provinces.

Furthermore, they argue that not much has changed despite the huge transfer of resources to the federating units from the federal divisible pool.

At present, Pakistan is drowning in an economic crisis. Those opposed to the amendment put the blame for Pakistan’s economic woes on the changes in the constitution that were made in 2010.

According to them, a major chunk of money has been given to the provincial units. Resultantly, the centre runs without sufficient resources to meet debt servicing obligations and defense expenditure. The centre, according to them, is left without resources to finance various federal subjects.

Putting the whole blame squarely on the 18th amendment for the economic crisis is only to cover bad economy that the current government has inherited from the previous one and the incumbent government’s own failure to manage economic crisis effectively and timely.

Let us suppose if somehow the constitutional changes are reversed, it would certainly sow the seeds of political instability and deep resentments.

Alim ullah Soomro
Karachi

Published in Dawn, April 16th, 2019

Opinion

Editorial

Geopolitical games
Updated 18 Dec, 2024

Geopolitical games

While Assad may be gone — and not many are mourning the end of his brutal rule — Syria’s future does not look promising.
Polio’s toll
18 Dec, 2024

Polio’s toll

MONDAY’s attacks on polio workers in Karak and Bannu that martyred Constable Irfanullah and wounded two ...
Development expenditure
18 Dec, 2024

Development expenditure

PAKISTAN’S infrastructure development woes are wide and deep. The country must annually spend at least 10pc of its...
Risky slope
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Risky slope

Inflation likely to see an upward trajectory once high base effect tapers off.
Digital ID bill
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Digital ID bill

Without privacy safeguards, a centralised digital ID system could be misused for surveillance.
Dangerous revisionism
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Dangerous revisionism

When hatemongers call for digging up every mosque to see what lies beneath, there is a darker agenda driving matters.