Sugar mills owners barred from selling properties

Published May 22, 2019
The judge adjourned further hearing for arguments till Sept 16. — Dawn/File
The judge adjourned further hearing for arguments till Sept 16. — Dawn/File

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court on Tuesday restrained the owners of Kashmir Sugar Mills from selling the mills properties till the decision on a loan recovery suit filed against them by a private bank.

The bank in its suit contended that the mills’ owners (directors) had obtained a loan against the mortgage of 2,017,400 sugar bags weighing 50kg each in 2013.

It said the directors, including Tariq Shafi, Javed Shafi, Ibrahim Tariq, Zahid Shafi, Ali Pervez, Hasnain Tariq Shafi, Mian Pervez Shafi and Khalida Pervez, believed to be relatives of Sharif family, had also submitted their personal sureties for the loan. However, the mills defaulted on the loan and the bank filed the suit for a decree of Rs640.5 million.

Advocate Shahzada Mazhar represented the Bank Alfalah and requested the court to restrain the respondents from selling out their properties. He said there was an apprehension that the respondents might dispose of the mills’ properties without paying back the loan as they enjoyed political influence.

Justice Muzammil Akhtar Shabbir allowed the request and restrained the respondents from selling and transferring the possession of the properties in question till the final decision on the loan recovery suit.

The judge adjourned further hearing for arguments till Sept 16.

AMNESTY: The Lahore High Court on Tuesday sought replies from federal government and the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) on a petition challenging the legality of Tax Amnesty Scheme-2019.

A citizen, Waheed Butt, challenged the scheme meant for declaration of ill gotten assets for being a relief to looters of public money.

The petitioner’s counsel argued that the amnesty scheme could not be launched unless approved by the parliament. He said the impugned scheme was only approved by the federal cabinet, which was against the Constitution.

However, he stated that the Constitution had no provision for announcing such schemes to benefit tax evaders. He asked the court to declare the scheme unconstitutional.

The court issued notice to the respondents and sought their replies by June 28.

Published in Dawn, May 22nd, 2019

Opinion

Who bears the cost?

Who bears the cost?

This small window of low inflation should compel a rethink of how the authorities and employers understand the average household’s

Editorial

Internet restrictions
Updated 23 Dec, 2024

Internet restrictions

Notion that Pakistan enjoys unprecedented freedom of expression difficult to reconcile with the reality of restrictions.
Bangladesh reset
23 Dec, 2024

Bangladesh reset

THE vibes were positive during Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s recent meeting with Bangladesh interim leader Dr...
Leaving home
23 Dec, 2024

Leaving home

FROM asylum seekers to economic migrants, the continuing exodus from Pakistan shows mass disillusionment with the...
Military convictions
Updated 22 Dec, 2024

Military convictions

Pakistan’s democracy, still finding its feet, cannot afford such compromises on core democratic values.
Need for talks
22 Dec, 2024

Need for talks

FOR a long time now, the country has been in the grip of relentless political uncertainty, featuring the...
Vulnerable vaccinators
22 Dec, 2024

Vulnerable vaccinators

THE campaign to eradicate polio from Pakistan cannot succeed unless the safety of vaccinators and security personnel...