By ordinance alone

Published September 5, 2019

THE opposition has once again slammed the government over its preoccupation with ruling by ordinances. In the latest instance, the opposition members were up in arms in protest when four ordinances, promulgated by President Arif Alvi, came before the Senate on Tuesday. The controversial GIDC ordinance was not among them, but the omission did little to contain the opposition members. The treasury was severely castigated for bypassing parliament, the protest being backed by a solid argument which termed the bunch of presidential ordinances as unconstitutional. The members duly referred to Article 89 of the Constitution which says the president may promulgate an ordinance, except when the Senate or National Assembly are in session. The Article further says the ordinance shall stand repealed at the expiration of 120 days from its promulgation or, “if before the expiration of that period a resolution disapproving it is passed by the Assembly, upon the passing of that resolution”. The treasury did try to counter this latest attack in the Senate by summoning the old defence. But whereas the point about the opposition’s non-cooperation did make sense, it couldn’t quite dispel the impression that the PTI government was from the outset determined not to ‘unnecessarily’ involve the opposition lawmakers in legislation.

Governments in the past, too, were blamed for resorting to the presidential ordinance. The fundamental question in the present case, however, stems from the ruling party’s obvious contempt for the legislators who occupy the opposition benches. This message is most candidly manifest in the repeated remarks of Prime Minister Imran Khan about the ‘corrupt’ parties and politicians who, regardless of the likes and dislikes of the sitting government, have quite a heavy presence in parliament today. In the Senate in particular, the numbers prevent the PTI government from winning easy passage for any bill it might want to introduce. Hence the reliance on presidential ordinances despite that it has been generally debunked as a dubious means to run the business. The choice of the route is, sadly, hardly surprising after Mr Khan had declared as early as December 2018 — barely a few months into power — that he planned to legislate by ordinance. Entering into a ‘settlement’ with the opposition meant that corruption cases against their leaders should be closed — an option the prime minister ‘would never go for’. A return to the regular route of legislation through parliament will require a basic change in the PM’s position.

Published in Dawn, September 5th, 2019

Opinion

Editorial

Military option
Updated 21 Nov, 2024

Military option

While restoring peace is essential, addressing Balochistan’s socioeconomic deprivation is equally important.
HIV/AIDS disaster
21 Nov, 2024

HIV/AIDS disaster

A TORTUROUS sense of déjà vu is attached to the latest health fiasco at Multan’s Nishtar Hospital. The largest...
Dubious pardon
21 Nov, 2024

Dubious pardon

IT is disturbing how a crime as grave as custodial death has culminated in an out-of-court ‘settlement’. The...
Islamabad protest
Updated 20 Nov, 2024

Islamabad protest

As Nov 24 draws nearer, both the PTI and the Islamabad administration must remain wary and keep within the limits of reason and the law.
PIA uncertainty
20 Nov, 2024

PIA uncertainty

THE failed attempt to privatise the national flag carrier late last month has led to a fierce debate around the...
T20 disappointment
20 Nov, 2024

T20 disappointment

AFTER experiencing the historic high of the One-day International series triumph against Australia, Pakistan came...