COLOMBO: A bill to repeal the Muslim Marriage and Divorce Act of 1951 was tabled in the Lankan parliament on Wednesday.

It was presented as a private member’s bill by Buddhist monk and Member of Parliament Athuraliye Rathana Thera during parliamentary session which marked the second day of the adjournment debate on the government policy statement presented by President Gotabaya Rajapaksa on Jan 3.

The marriage of children as young as 12 years is legal for Sri Lankan Muslims under the Muslim Marriage and Divorce Act (MMDA) in Sri Lanka, also known as the Muslim Personal Law.

For years Muslim activists have been fighting to change the laws to prevent abuse but have been opposed by radical as well as some moderate Muslim clergy members, including Muslim politicians.

Member of the committee on Muslim Personal Law Reforms, Rizwe Mufthi, who is also president of the All Ceylon Jamiyathul Ulama (ACJU) is on record declaring that the Muslim Marriage and Divorce Act (MMDA) is “perfect in the present state” and does not require changes resulting in Sri Lankan women groups reacting strongly many times, urging the state to intervene.

The committee to re-look at the Muslim Marriage law in Sri Lanka and suggest reform was appointed by the previous Rajapaksa government in 2009 during the time of former president Mahinda Rajapaksa, but no concrete change could take place following heavy criticism by male clerics and several key Lankan Islamic organisations against reforms.

Raising the age of marriage of females to 18 years, ensuring male responsibility towards their children in case of divorce, scrapping the female dowry provision, a thorough assessment by the Quazi board of the financial background and suitability of the male before marriage, and the inclusion of women to the Quazi board, are some points Muslims who support the amendment of the law had wanted added.

Activists fighting for the scrapping of the MMDA had wanted child marriage in Sri Lanka to be looked at as a sociological problem and not a religious problem. However Muslim activists had faced great pressure from their more radical or conservative counterparts and urged not to speak on the topic because it might raise anti Muslim sentiments in the country and those who did speak up were often labeled as pro West or helping to undermine Islam.

Published in Dawn, January 9th, 2020

Opinion

Editorial

Islamabad protest
Updated 20 Nov, 2024

Islamabad protest

As Nov 24 draws nearer, both the PTI and the Islamabad administration must remain wary and keep within the limits of reason and the law.
PIA uncertainty
20 Nov, 2024

PIA uncertainty

THE failed attempt to privatise the national flag carrier late last month has led to a fierce debate around the...
T20 disappointment
20 Nov, 2024

T20 disappointment

AFTER experiencing the historic high of the One-day International series triumph against Australia, Pakistan came...
Tribunals’ failure
Updated 19 Nov, 2024

Tribunals’ failure

With election tribunals having failed to fulfil their purpose, it isn't surprising that Pakistan has not been able to stabilise.
Balochistan MPC
19 Nov, 2024

Balochistan MPC

WHILE immediate threats to law and order must be confronted by security forces, the long-term solution to...
Firm tax measures
19 Nov, 2024

Firm tax measures

FINANCE Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb is ready to employ force to make everyone and every sector in Pakistan pay their...