LONDON: Mayor of London Sadiq Khan speaks to reporters outside the Royal Courts of Justice after the judgement on Thursday.—AFP
LONDON: Mayor of London Sadiq Khan speaks to reporters outside the Royal Courts of Justice after the judgement on Thursday.—AFP

LONDON: Britain’s Court of Appeal on Thursday ruled in favour of environmental campaigners who oppose the building of a third runway at London’s Heathrow airport, Europe’s busiest.

The court said the UK government — which approved the Heathrow extension in 2018 after years of delays — had failed to take into account commitments to the Paris Agreement on limiting global warming.

In reaction, triumphant campaigners called on Prime Minister Boris Johnson — who in 2015 pledged to lie in front of bulldozers to stop Heathrow’s third runway for both environmental and aesthetic reasons — to finally cancel the project.

The legal action against the approval was brought by various London councils, environmental groups including Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth, and London Mayor Sadiq Khan. They lost at an original hearing in May.

Presenting a summary of the ruling, Judge Keith Lindblom said that two years ago, the government of prime minister Theresa May had given no explanation of how it took into account the 2015 Paris accord — which seeks to cap global warming to less than two degrees Celsius from pre-industrial levels — on building the new runway.

“The Paris Agreement ought to have been taken into account... and an explanation given as to how it was taken into account, but it was not,” Lord Justice Lindblom said.

The current Conservative government has decided not to appeal the ruling at London’s Supreme Court.

However, Johnson, who has in recent times appeared ambiguous over his once-staunch opposition to the project, may still have to make an official decision on scrapping it.

Notably, Heathrow airport — which is owned by a consortium led by Spanish construction giant Ferrovial — said it would appeal Thursday’s ruling.

Heathrow, west of Lon­don, wants to increase its total capacity to 130 million passengers per day, compared to about 78m currently.

“Expanding Heathrow, Britain’s biggest port and only hub, is essential to achieving the prime minister’s vision of Global Britain,” the airport said on Thursday.

Following Thursday’s ruling, Sadiq Khan called on Johnson’s government “to abandon plans for Runway Three”. “I’m delighted by the decision handed out by the court of appeal,” the London mayor told reporters outside the court.

“I’ve always said that we’ve got serious consequences about the government’s plan to have a new runway at Heathrow because of the impact in the climate emergency, on the air quality, on noise pollution (and) on the quality of life of Londoners.”

Published in Dawn, February 28th, 2020

Opinion

Who bears the cost?

Who bears the cost?

This small window of low inflation should compel a rethink of how the authorities and employers understand the average household’s

Editorial

Internet restrictions
23 Dec, 2024

Internet restrictions

JUST how much longer does the government plan on throttling the internet is a question up in the air right now....
Bangladesh reset
23 Dec, 2024

Bangladesh reset

THE vibes were positive during Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s recent meeting with Bangladesh interim leader Dr...
Leaving home
23 Dec, 2024

Leaving home

FROM asylum seekers to economic migrants, the continuing exodus from Pakistan shows mass disillusionment with the...
Military convictions
Updated 22 Dec, 2024

Military convictions

Pakistan’s democracy, still finding its feet, cannot afford such compromises on core democratic values.
Need for talks
22 Dec, 2024

Need for talks

FOR a long time now, the country has been in the grip of relentless political uncertainty, featuring the...
Vulnerable vaccinators
22 Dec, 2024

Vulnerable vaccinators

THE campaign to eradicate polio from Pakistan cannot succeed unless the safety of vaccinators and security personnel...