KARACHI: The Sindh High Court on Wednesday set aside the five-year imprisonment handed down to a journalist by a trial court in the case pertaining to possession of hate literature to foment religious disharmony.

An antiterrorism court had sentenced Nasrullah Khan Chaudhry to five years in prison in December and Nasrullah Khan, journalist associated with the Urdu-language daily Nai Baat, through his lawyer challenged the trial court order before the SHC.

After hearing arguments and examining the record and proceedings of the case, the two-judge bench headed by Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi allowed the appeal and overturned the conviction order of the trial court through a short order. The reasons will be recorded later.

Lawyer for the appellant advocate Mohammad Farooq contended that the judgement of the trial court was not in accordance with the basic principles of law and maintained that the Counter-Terrorism Department had kept the appellant in wrongful detention for three days and then framed him in the present case.

The counsel further argued that it was a case of no evidence and even the FIR was not in accordance with law. He asserted that the prosecution did not produce any evidence regarding the recovery of hate literature from the appellant and Section 11-W(i) of the Anti-Terrorism Act was not applicable to the case and pleaded to set aside the conviction.

The additional prosecutor general argued that the prosecution proved its case and asked the court to uphold the trial court’s judgement. He further contended that the appellant was associated with a banned militant organisation.

The ATC had handed down five-year imprisonment to him and imposed a fine under Section 11-W(i) (printing, publishing or disseminating any material to incite hatred or giving projection to any person convicted for a terrorist act or any proscribed organisation or an organisation placed under observation or anyone concerned in terrorism) and six-month term in sections 11-F(i) (a person is guilty of an offence if he belongs or professes to belong to a proscribed organization) of the ATA.

The prosecution maintained in the charge sheet that the senior journalist was arrested on Nov 11, 2018 in the Garden area and claimed that he was carrying some journals and booklets about Afghan jihad, Punjabi Taliban and other books which contained material for getting people instigated on religious grounds and creating religious disharmony as well as encouraging them for jihad.

It also alleged that the journalist had links with Khalid Mukshi, a leader of Al-Qaeda. However, Mukshi was not named as an accused or absconder in the charge sheet.

Published in Dawn, April 9th, 2020

Opinion

Editorial

Ultimate price
Updated 02 Nov, 2024

Ultimate price

To dismantle culture of impunity for crimes against journalists, state must ensure that perpetrators do not go unpunished.
Mastung bombing
02 Nov, 2024

Mastung bombing

INSTABILITY continues to haunt Balochistan, as Friday morning’s bombing in Mastung has shown. At least nine...
Plane speak
02 Nov, 2024

Plane speak

DESPITE all its efforts to facilitate PIA’s privatisation, it seems the government only ended up being taken for a...
Seeking investment
Updated 01 Nov, 2024

Seeking investment

Foreign visits will be fruitless unless crucial structural, policy reforms directly affecting investors are focused.
State-backed terror
01 Nov, 2024

State-backed terror

OVER the past year or so, India’s reportedly malign activities in foreign countries have increasingly come under the radar, with
Shared crisis
01 Nov, 2024

Shared crisis

WITH Lahore experiencing unprecedented levels of smog, the Punjab government has announced a series of “green...