FO rejects ‘misleading’ reports about OIC virtual meeting

Published May 28, 2020
Says “a large number of ambassadors” supported Pakistani position implies that not all of them backed it. — APP/File
Says “a large number of ambassadors” supported Pakistani position implies that not all of them backed it. — APP/File

ISLAMABAD: The Foreign Office on Wednesday rejected as “misleading” media reporting of a virtual meeting of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) ambassadors at New York in which the Maldives objected to singling out of India for Islamophobia and Pakistan reportedly failed in its attempt to form a group on the issue.

FO spokesperson Aisha Farooqui, according to a statement, rejected the “misleading and factually incorrect” media reports about the virtual meeting of OIC ambassadors to the United Nations on May 20.

Dawn in its edition of May 27 reported about Maldivian objection and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) disallowing formation of the group on the grounds that it was the mandate of the foreign ministers.

The FO statement recapped points from the speech of Pakistan’s Permanent Representative to the UN in New York Munir Akram about growing incidents of Islamophobia in India and gravity of the situation. It then went on say that “a large number of OIC ambassadors” shared the concerns about the situation in India and supported the need for a coordinated OIC position on Islamophobia at the UN.

The statement’s assertion that “a large number of ambassadors” supported Pakistani position implies that not all of them backed it. Furthermore, the statement skipped Maldivian objection.

Maldivian foreign ministry in a statement on the meeting said: “Maldives cannot support any action within OIC that singles out or targets India.”

According to serving Pakistani diplomats, the OIC meeting participants with non-conforming views were traditionally brought around by “heavy weight” — a reference to Saudi Arabia and Egypt — but in this instance the Maldives persisted with its objection and there was no reach-out by any of the so-called heavyweights on the controversial remark.

The rejoinder furthermore makes no mention of Amb Akram’s call for the OIC countries to join Pakistan in a small working group for considering actions that the OIC can take at the UN to counter Islamophobia.

The UAE disallowed the move on technical grounds.

The FO, however, recalled past OIC statements “on Islamophobia and targeted violence against Muslims in India”.

“The OIC and its human rights body — OIC-IPHRC — have issued strong statements on the Indian Government’s recent anti-Muslim actions, including CAA, targeted killing of Muslims in Delhi, Babri Masjid verdict, and demonisation of Muslims in the context of Covid-19,” it recalled.

The FO maintained that besides OIC, the United Nations human rights machinery, international human rights organisations and international media had taken cognisance of the situation and expressed concerns on the plight of Muslims in India.

Published in Dawn, May 28th, 2020

Opinion

Editorial

Geopolitical games
Updated 18 Dec, 2024

Geopolitical games

While Assad may be gone — and not many are mourning the end of his brutal rule — Syria’s future does not look promising.
Polio’s toll
18 Dec, 2024

Polio’s toll

MONDAY’s attacks on polio workers in Karak and Bannu that martyred Constable Irfanullah and wounded two ...
Development expenditure
18 Dec, 2024

Development expenditure

PAKISTAN’S infrastructure development woes are wide and deep. The country must annually spend at least 10pc of its...
Risky slope
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Risky slope

Inflation likely to see an upward trajectory once high base effect tapers off.
Digital ID bill
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Digital ID bill

Without privacy safeguards, a centralised digital ID system could be misused for surveillance.
Dangerous revisionism
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Dangerous revisionism

When hatemongers call for digging up every mosque to see what lies beneath, there is a darker agenda driving matters.